GOP Senator Calls Trump's Trade Agreement a 'Major Win' Before Admitting She Has No Idea What's in It

GOP Senator Calls Trump's Trade Agreement a 'Major Win' Before Admitting She Has No Idea What's in It

Rich text editor, edit-body-und-0-value, press ALT 0 for help.

One of the most excited supporters of President Donald Trump's new "renegotiation" of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) is Sen. Joni Ernst (R-IA).


After Monday's announcement of the deal, which Trump has rebranded the U.S.-Mexico-Canada Agreement (USMCA), Ernst tweeted, "Thank you, @realDonaldTrump ! The #USMCA is a good trade deal for our state’s farmers.  Looking forward to hosting your next visit to Iowa." And in an interview with CBS, Ernst called the deal a "great win for Iowa farmers and ranchers."

Only one problem: she has not actually read the deal yet. And when CBS's Nora O'Donnell asked Ernst how, exactly, the deal helps Iowa farmers and ranchers, she admitted it.

"We haven't seen the negotiated texts of the language that's being put out there for the agreement and I do look forward to going through that very specific text," said Ernst. "But we do know that we all feel as Americans and Canadians and Mexicans that this is a great way forward. It is modernizing what was NAFTA and we have an even stronger agreement now."

While Ernst has not read the USMCA, plenty of experts have examined the deal, and the broad consensus is that it doesn't really do that much. It requires Canadians to import slightly more U.S. milk, and it tweaks the requirements for foreign-manufactured cars to qualify for tariff exemptions, but neither is likely to have a substantial impact.

The only significant change from NAFTA is an update to intellectual property agreements which was already in the Trans-Pacific Partnership (TPP), the huge four-continent trade deal that President Barack Obama helped negotiate, and that Trump pulled the U.S. out of on his first week in office — something Ernst herself decried at the time.

Trump has previously called NAFTA a "disaster" and the "single worst deal ever approved." But while NAFTA, like many free trade agreements, has faced opposition, most Americans support it. It was an especially good deal for American farmers, because it eliminated Mexican agricultural tariffs.

While it could certainly be argued that USMCA is a marginally better deal for America than NAFTA was, it is hard to argue it was worth it when the cost was blowing up a bigger trade deal that would have grown the U.S. economy by $200 billion and given us equal footing with China in Asian markets.

It makes even less sense considering that in the process of securing this deal, Trump declared a pointless trade war that is threatening hundreds of thousands of U.S. jobs and raising manufacturing costs.

#story_page_ below_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.