Kavanaugh's Yale Classmate Says 'Truly Important' Information Never Got to the FBI: 'It's a Con Job'

Kavanaugh's Yale Classmate Says 'Truly Important' Information Never Got to the FBI: 'It's a Con Job'

The reopened FBI background investigation into Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh, prompted by allegations of sexual assault, has concluded.


But while Republicans claim the finished report — which consists of a single copy in a sensitive, compartmented information facility that senators have limited time to look over — is exonerating, there is a broad outcry from dozens of witnesses who claim they contacted the FBI with information relevant to the investigation, and were ignored.

One such person is William Scheuerman, a former classmate of Kavanaugh's at Yale, who told MSNBC's Ari Melber that he had completely lost faith in the legitimacy of the investigation.

"The FBI didn't get back to me," he said. "At first, I thought nothing of it, I thought they were on top of their game. And then I started getting emails from classmates, other residents of Lawrence Hall, and it turned out a lot of people, including people who had some truly important information, were not being contacted by the FBI, and of course, this is extremely unsettling."

"Is your view that you, and/or your classmates, have reason to think that [Kavanaugh's second accuser] Ms. Ramirez was credible?" asked Melber.

"I think it's credible. I do think we need an investigation, and I think what's being called an investigation is not," said Scheuerman. "It's a con job."

Watch below:

The FBI investigation was so incomplete, in fact, that even first accuser Dr. Christine Blasey Ford and Kavanaugh themselves were not interviewed.

In addition to the lack of follow-up on tips, the FBI was reportedly limited in subject matter, with the White House not allowing agents to investigate whether Kavanaugh lied in his sworn testimony to the Senate.

Cloture on Kavanaugh's nomination was filed this week, with the final vote planned to take place over Friday and Saturday.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close