Sen. Lindsey Graham Goes After Kavanaugh's Latest Accuser with a Classic 'Blame the Victim' Defense

Sen. Lindsey Graham Goes After Kavanaugh's Latest Accuser with a Classic 'Blame the Victim' Defense

Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) went on the attack Wednesday against Supreme Court nominee Brett Kavanaugh's latest accuser, Julie Swetnick, throwing doubts on her credibility and using the classic tactic of "blaming the victim."


In a new filing made under the threat of perjury, Swetnick, represented by lawyer MIchael Avenatti, claims that she attended a series of parties in the early 1980s with Kavanaugh where he was aggressive with women and "spiked" the punch bowl in order to make women subject to "gang rape."

Graham disputed the likelihood of the claims in a series of tweets:

While Swetnick's claims have not been proven, and Kavanaugh has strongly denied them, Graham unnecessarily and callously attacks Swetnick in these tweets in a deeply misogynistic way. First, he refers to Avenatti as a "lawyer to porn stars" because he represents Stormy Daniels, an adult film director and performer, in her lawsuit against President Donald Trump. The idea that Avenatti should be less credible because he has represented a porn star is inherently demeaning.

Second, Graham's claim that a woman wouldn't repeatedly put herself in abusive situations is also completely belied by what is known about sexual abuse. It's widely accepted victims of abuse often stay married to or otherwise involved with abusers for myriad reasons — denying this fact about sexual abuse is simply ignorant and amounts to blaming victims for the psychological trauma they experience.

This is especially true when Graham asks, "Isn't there some duty to warn others?" Of course, if Swetnick's allegations are true, what she is doing now, testifying to her claims, is the epitome of warning others about abuse. And Graham's reaction, immediately doubting her and criticizing her from coming forward, is exactly why so many women never tell their stories.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close