Senate Judiciary Chairman Begs Constituents To Stop Asking Him About Brett Kavanaugh at Town Hall

Senate Judiciary Chairman Begs Constituents To Stop Asking Him About Brett Kavanaugh at Town Hall

With D.C. appeals court judge Brett Kavanaugh's Supreme Court hearings over, and his record of lies to the Senate and legal extremism laid bare for all to see, voters are demanding answers from their senators.


One senator who seems highly unwilling to talk about the issue is Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-IA), who chairs the Senate Judiciary Committee. In fact, at a town hall in Osceola, Grassley was bombarded with so many Kavanaugh questions that he started imploring the attendees to ask about something else.

"If you folks are wondering why we're talking about Kavanaugh all the time, if somebody came here to talk about tariffs, somebody came here to talk about budgets, somebody came here to talk about something else, raise your hand," he said.

Grassley has been instrumental in the far-right reshaping of federal courts since assuming the chairmanship in 2015. He worked to ensure Supreme Court nominee Merrick Garland never saw even a hearing, then immediately began ramming through President Donald Trump's judicial picks, including several with extreme activist agendas.

For the Kavanaugh confirmation, Grassley — who has long claimed to be a champion of open records — did an end run around the National Archives and instead tasked President George W. Bush's private attorney Bill Burck, a close ally of Kavanaugh, with curating records from Kavanaugh's years as Staff Secretary in the Bush administration.

Grassley then designated most of those documents "committee confidential," including some that appear to show Kavanaugh lied under oath about his use of memos stolen from Democratic senators. These documents would have been sealed from the public and even the full Senate had Democratic members of the committee not ignored Grassley and released them anyway.

Grassley knows full well that this confirmation — and the tactics he is using to force it through — could be the most consequential moment of his entire Senate career. Yet for some reason, he does not want to discuss it with the voters.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.