Watch Brett Kavanaugh Try to Mansplain His Way Out of Answering Kamala Harris' Question on Same-Sex Marriage

Watch Brett Kavanaugh Try to Mansplain His Way Out of Answering Kamala Harris' Question on Same-Sex Marriage

In the Supreme Court confirmation hearings for Judge Brett Kavanaugh, Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) has put him in the hot seat again and again and again. She rendered him speechless by challenging him to name one law that impacts the male body as much as abortion laws affect women. And she put him in the hot seat by demanding to know whether he had discussed Special Counsel Robert Mueller's Russia investigation with people at the law firm founded by President Donald Trump's former personal lawyer.

But Kavanaugh still felt it prudent to talk down to her rather than engage her questions honestly. And nowhere was that more apparent than when she asked him a simple yes or no question about the seminal same-sex marriage decision Obergefell v. Hodges.

"In Obergefell, as you know, the Court held that same-sex couples have a right to marry," Harris pressed him. "My question is whether the Obergefell case was correctly decided, in your opinion."

"Senator, Justice Kennedy wrote the majority opinion in a series of five cases," Kavanaugh said. "Romer v. Evans—"

"If we can just talk about Obergefell, that'd be great," Harris cut in.

"I want to explain it," replied Kavanaugh.

"I actually know the history leading up to Obergefell," Harris replied coolly. "Can you just please address your comments to Obergefell?"

"So, I'd like to explain it if I can," insisted Kavanaugh, continuing to ignore her question and speak as if she, as a lawyer and former prosecutor, was not already well versed in the background of the decision. "He wrote the majority opinion in Romer v. Evans, Lawrence v. Texas, United States v. Windsor, Obergefell, and Masterpiece Cakeshop, concluding in Masterpiece Cakeshop, importantly, with a statement, if I could just read this—"

"No, please don't, because I actually have read it, and I'm sure most have," said Harris. "My question is very specific. Can you comment, on your personal opinion, on whether Obergefell was correctly decided? It's a yes or no. Please."

"In Masterpiece Cakeshop," Kavanaugh continued, "and this is, I think, relevant to your question, Justice Kennedy wrote, in the majority opinion joined by Chief Justice Roberts, and Justice Alito, and Justice Gorsuch, and Justice Breyer, and Justice Kagan, 'The days of discriminating against gay and lesbian Americans, or treating gay and lesbian Americans as inferior in dignity and worth, are over,' to paraphrase him."

"Do you agree with that statement?" Harris pressed him.

"That is the precedent of the Supreme Court, agreed with by—"

"You, sir. I'm asking your opinion," Harris said. "You're the nominee right now, and so it is probative of your ability to serve on the highest court in your land. So I'm asking you a very specific question. Either you're willing to answer it or not, and if you're not willing to answer it, we can move on. But do you believe Obergefell was correctly decided?"

Finally, realizing that Harris would not let him pass off his unnecessary history lecture as an answer, Kavanaugh told her he was not going to tell her his opinion.

"So, each of the justices have declined, as a matter of judicial independence — each of them — to answer questions in that line of cases," he said.

"So you will not answer that question?"

"Following the precedent set by those eight justices, they've all declined when asked to answer that question."


Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ }}