Watch: Anita Hill Explains Why Brett Kavanaugh Has 'Burden of Persuasion' in Sexual Assault Allegation

Watch: Anita Hill Explains Why Brett Kavanaugh Has 'Burden of Persuasion' in Sexual Assault Allegation

In a new interview on ABC's Good Morning America, Brandeis University Professor Anita Hill — who famously  testified about her sexual harassment at the hands of Clarence Thomas as he was confirmed to the Supreme Court in 1991 — is speaking out on the new sexual assault allegations against Supreme Court Nominee Brett Kavanaugh by California psychology professor Christine Blasey Ford.

In the interview with George Stephanopoulos, Hill strongly supported Ford's request that the FBI investigate the incident before the Senate goes through with hearings, because, "the hearing questions need to have a frame," and an investigation would inform the questions senators can ask. She also urged that expert witnesses be invited to give information. And she criticized the timeline Republicans were trying to set up, insisting "six days is not enough" to get to the bottom of the charges.

Ultimately, Hill stressed, the reason Kavanaugh should bear the "burden of persuasion" is that "we are talking about a lifetime appointment on our nation's highest court ... it is an honor and a privilege to be nominated and to serve, not an entitlement."

"We need to be able to believe in the integrity of our courts, and that means believing in the integrity of the individuals who are on it," she concluded.

Hill's allegations against Thomas drew scorn and attack from many Republican senators — some of whom, like Sen. Orrin Hatch, are still around and using the same playbook on Ford.

Ford, who is now facing death threats for coming forward, alleges that at a party in the early 1980s when she was 15, Kavanaugh pulled her into a room, held her down, groped her, tried to undress her, and covered her mouth while a friend, Mark Judge, looked on and laughed.

Since detailing the allegation, Republicans have proposed giving her a hearing, but are still trying to hold the vote immediately after, refusing to support a preliminary FBI investigation, and are not calling Judge or any other witnesses to testify.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.