Republicans Are Killing a Bill to Protect U.S. Elections From Russia - at the Request of Trump's White House

Republicans Are Killing a Bill to Protect U.S. Elections From Russia  -  at the Request of Trump's White House

According to a new report from Yahoo News, a potentially groundbreaking bill to secure U.S. elections from hostile attacks like those carried out by Russia in 2016, known as the Secure Elections Act, is now stalled and effectively dead.


The amazing part is that for a while, Senate Republicans actually seemed to be on board. The bill was introduced by Sen. James Lankford (R-OK), and had a mixed company of co-sponsors including Sens. Amy Klobuchar (D-MN), Kamala Harris (D-CA), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Susan Collins (R-ME).

But then, President Donald Trump's White House intervened.

Before the bill could be marked up in committee, however, officials in the Department of Homeland Security intervened, prompting Senate Rules Committee Chairman Roy Blunt (R-MO) to cancel any further action on it:

In a statement to Yahoo News, White House spokeswoman Lindsay Walters says that while the administration “appreciates Congress’s interest in election security, [the Department of Homeland Security] has all the statutory authority it needs to assist state and local officials to improve the security of existing election infrastructure.”

Under current law, DHS is already able to work with state and local authorities to protect elections, Walters wrote. If Congress pursues the Secure Elections Act, it should avoid duplicating “existing DHS efforts or the imposition of unnecessary requirements” and “not violate the principles of Federalism.”

“We cannot support legislation with inappropriate mandates or that moves power or funding from the states to Washington for the planning and operation of elections,” she added. However, the White House gave no specifics on what parts of the bill it objected to.

The bill, had it passed, would have improved information sharing on election security between the states and the federal government, given a security clearance to secretaries of state to receive classified threat information on election risks, mandated states conduct audits for irregularities after any federal election, and provided financial incentives for states to replace paperless electronic voting machines, which are broadly considered unsecure and hackable by experts.

While there is no evidence so far that electronic voting machines themselves were hacked in the 2016 elections, experts believe Russian hackers penetrated the election websites or voter registration rolls of at least 7 states: Alaska, Arizona, California, Florida, Illinois, Texas, and Wisconsin.

The White House has refused to take seriously the threat of election hacking. Instead, insofar as they have discussed election security at all, it is about the fictional threat of millions of people illegally casting second votes in person — which Trump wants to address with strict rules forcing people to show duplicative ID at the polls, regardless of the difficulty or cost of obtaining them for poorer voters.

Needless to say, this would have no bearing on the risk of election hacking. But it has been an obsession for Trump, who formed an "Election Integrity Commission" to look into the matter, only for the group to collapse amid a bipartisan state refusal to submit data and a lawsuit from one of its own members.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.