New Analysis Shows Republicans Could Be Wiped Out in the Midterms Worse Than They Were in 2006

new analysis from the Cook Political Report’s Amy Walter shows that the Republican Party should be deeply worried about their prospects in the 2018 midterm elections — and she warns they could face an even bigger wipeout than in 2006.


The basis of Walter’s dire forecast for the GOP is her analysis of past Cook ratings for past “wave” midterm elections in 2006 and 2010, in which the organization had listed fewer seats as “highly vulnerable” in August before adding several more such seats to the “highly vulnerable” category by November.

“For example, between July 2006 and November 2006, we moved 24-GOP held seats from Lean/Likely Republican to Toss-Up (or worse),” she writes. “Between August and November of 2010, we moved 35 Democratic-held seats from Lean/Likely Democratic to Toss-Up (or worse).”

Why is this so potentially ominous for the GOP? Because in both 2006 and 2010, the party that controlled Congress wound up losing significantly more seats than the August “highly vulnerable” ratings would suggest.

What’s more, Walter says that “Republicans already have more seats in the highly vulnerable category than they had at this point in 2006 or than Democrats had in August of 2010."

In the end, Walter concludes that the GOP had better pray something big changes between now and November, or else they face the very real prospect of an electoral wipeout.

“If 2018 follows a similar pattern to 2006 and 2010 — where less vulnerable seats move into more vulnerable territory in the fall — the GOP is almost certain to lose their majority,” she writes.

Read the whole analysis here.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.