How a 62-Year-Old Unsolved Mystery Could Stifle Robert Mueller’s Russia Investigation

How a 62-Year-Old Unsolved Mystery Could Stifle Robert Mueller’s Russia Investigation

President Donald Trump's Justice Department may be able to bring him salvation from the Robert Mueller probe in an unexpected way.


Although the most immediate concern, of course, is that the Mueller probe will find damning material about Trump (read: proof that he broke the law), the fact that Republicans will have enough votes in the Senate to block Trump's removal from office regardless of the Mueller probe's conclusions does somewhat protect Trump from its potential findings. Then again, those same Republican senators could theoretically be pressured into removing Trump if the report's conclusions are so overwhelmingly unflattering that even Trump's supporters turn against him (an exceptionally unlikely scenario, to be sure, but not outright impossible).

That's where the new Justice Department position on an unrelated, decades-old murder case comes into play, as a new report from Politico explains:

The case at the appeals court was brought by attorney and author Stuart McKeever, who has spent decades investigating the disappearance of Jesus Galindez, a Columbia university professor and political activist who vanished in New York City in 1956. His body was never found, but there are indications that he was kidnapped and flown to the Dominican Republic, where he may have been killed.

The unsolved 62-year-old mystery, which also sweeps in the death of an American pilot and two trials in Washington of a man charged with being an unregistered Dominican Republic agent, is so colorful and convoluted that it inspired a 2003 film starring Harvey Keitel, “The Galindez File.”

McKeever, 82, wants a judge to release secret testimony given to a DC-based grand jury that investigated Galindez's disappearance. But the Justice Department argues that judges don’t have “inherent authority” to release such information unless it falls under exemptions approved by Congress, which don’t apply in the Galindez case — or in many others, including potentially Mueller’s investigation.

While it is unclear if the Justice Department is taking this position on the Galindez case as a pro forma act or because it realizes how it could help Trump, the underlying issue is unmistakable: If the Washington appeals court decides in September that judges can't release grand jury information which would normally be kept secret unless it falls under exemptions approved by Congress, any information acquired about Trump by the Mueller report could be legally kept under wraps.

"It is a sleeper case. If the D.C. Circuit were to accept the Department of Justice’s arguments…that would have potentially enormous implications for the future of the information from the Mueller investigation. That could close out a path by which that information becomes public," Harvard Law professor Alex Whiting told Politico.

#story_page_post_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}