'In Plain Sight': Former Watergate Prosecutor Explains Why Trump's Tweets May Place Him in Serious Legal Jeopardy

With renewed attention on President Donald Trump's Twitter feed after the New York Times reported that special counsel Robert Mueller may be considering his tweets as a part of an obstruction of justice case, former Watergate assistant prosecutor Jill Wine-Banks argued that the obstruction crime has occurred out in the open.

"I think the case of obstruction has been clear for over a year," she said on MSNBC Thursday. "It's very, very clear now."

She added that Mueller is likely to focus on the obstruction case ahead of the 2018 elections. Any indictments on collusion, she argued, will likely come after the election.

She also argued that his Twitter feed "establishes a pattern of behavior, and it shows what his intent really is."

"I've been saying for more than a year that the case for obstruction is in plain sight. And part of it is that he talks to the public, and he talks through Twitter, and that's the same as if he approached someone in private. He's sending a message to people: 'Do what I want, or else.' He could say that in a one-on-one meeting, or he could say it through his Twitter account. Both of them amount to obstruction of justice, and he should be held liable," she said.

Watch the clip below:

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.