'A Disgusting Smear of a Reporter': BuzzFeed News Editor Warns DOJ's Latest Attack on the Press Is Deeply Troubling

The Justice Department's seizure of email and phone records from New York Times reporter Ali Watkins sparked widespread criticism and fear of an attack on the First Amendment when it was revealed on Thursday.

As the case has moved forward, BuzzFeed News editor Ben Smith is arguing that the department's tactics are truly concerning — particularly with regard to the treatment of Watkins.

Watkins was swept up in the investigation of James Wolfe, a former staffer on the Senate Intelligence Committee, for supposedly leaking classified information. He was indicted Thursday night for lying to the FBI — not for leaking — but Watkins, who had a relationship with Wolfe, featured in the indictment.

“The way the indictment is written is clearly aimed at launching a disgusting smear of a reporter, and it has had that effect,” Smith told the Washington Post. He was Watkins' boss when she worked at BuzzFeed, and he defended the integrity of her work.

Andrew Kaczynski, a CNN reporter, agreed: "The Trump administration actions here — besides showing their disregard for press freedom — has had the effect of launching some disgustingly sexist harassment of a reporter."

The Post suggests that Watkins' relationship with Wolfe may have created conflicts of interest, particularly when she worked at McClatchy, because she reportedly didn't inform the outlet of the relationship. She did inform the New York Times, where she now works, before she was hired.

But these issues are not relevant to the government's interest in the matter — and any sense that the federal agents are going after a specific reporter could be deeply chilling to a free press.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.