Watch Kamala Harris Shoot Down Evasive Gina Haspel Answers About the Morality of Torture

Sen. Kamala Harris (D-CA) put her skills as a prosecutor on full display during Wednesday's hearing for President Donald Trump's nominee to lead the CIA.

Nominee Gina Haspel has faced intense scrutiny over her role in the Bush-era interrogation program that was found to include torture among its techniques. President Barack Obama famously acknowledged the U.S. role in torture publicly during Bush's presidency and committed to banning it.

Harris wanted to get down to the basic moral question of torture as Haspel kept resorting to legalese when asked about her past role.

“So one question I have not heard you answer is, ‘Do you believe that the previous interrogation techniques were immoral?'” Harris asked. “It’s a ‘yes or no’ answer.”

“Senator, I believe that CIA did extraordinary work to prevent another attack on this country giving the legal tools we were authorized to use,” Haspel evasively replied.

“Please answer yes or no,” Harris doubled down “Do you believe in hindsight that those techniques were immoral?”

“Senator, what I believe sitting here today is that I support the higher moral standard we have decided to hold ourselves to,” Haspel answered.

Harris wasn't having it.

“Can you please answer the question?” the senator shot back.

“Senator, I think I’ve answered the question,” Haspel responded to no avail.

“No, you have not,” Harris said. “Do you believe the previous techniques, now armed with hindsight, do you believe they were immoral? Yes or no?”

Once again, Haspel refused to answer. Harris was done.

"You've not answered the question, but I'm going to move on."


Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.