MSNBC Host Argues that Rod Rosenstein Cleverly Outsmarted Trump's Attempt to Weaponize the FBI

Observers hotly debated whether Deputy Attorney General had completely succumbed to President Donald Trump's will over weekend by following the president's order to start an investigation into whether probe of the Trump campaign was started with political intent. MSNBC's Lawrence O'Donnell argued Monday night, however, that Rosenstein wasn't overpowered, but he was actually cleverly outsmarting the president's attempts to weaponize the FBI.


The issue arose after Trump tweeted on Sunday that he was demanding an investigation into origins of the Russia probe, which recent reports say involved an FBI informant contacting members of Trump's campaign. While many expected that Rosenstein would resign rather than follow a corrupt order, the deputy attorney general shortly issued a statement saying he would direct the inspector general to look into the matter.

But in O'Donnell's view, the details of Rosenstein's statement were critically important.

"Rosenstein was ready for this, he could see this one coming," O'Donnell said."Rod Rosenstein issued a statement saying, 'If anyone did infiltrate or surveil participants in a presidential campaign for inappropriate purposes, we need to know about it and take appropriate action.'"

He continued: "Now understand, Rod Rosenstein is in a position to already know whether anyone did 'infiltrate or surveil participants in a presidential campaign.' He already knows that that did not happen. Rod Rosenstein certainly already knows what is publicly reported, that someone in England had a couple of conversations with a couple of people who were affiliated with the Trump campaign, and that source in England told the FBI about those conversations. That is not 'infiltrated or surveilled' as Donald Trump put it."

And so, O'Donnell argued, there's nothing to find — and Rosenstein knows it. 

"Rod Rosenstein knows that there was an investigation of Russian interference in the presidential campaign, and possible Russian influence and assistance to the Trump campaign and that that investigation was not conducted for political purposes," he concluded.

Watch the clip below:

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.