Trump Is Weighing a New Attack Against Syria - Would It Even Be Legal?

President Donald Trump is considering retaliation after new footage emerged that allegedly shows a chemical attack waged by Syrian President Bashar al-Assad against his own people.


"We're making decisions as to what we do with respect to the horrible attack that was made near Damascus," Trump said Monday. "And it will be met. And it will be met forcefully. When I will not say because I don't like talking about timing."

He continued: "We're going to make a decision tonight or shortly thereafter. We can't let that happen in our world, especially when we're able to -- because of the power of the United States — we're able to stop it." 

Trump previously ordered airstrikes against the Syrian government in 2017 in response to another chemical weapons attack. But both that action and any military response under consideration would likely be illegal. International law prohibits unilateral military intervention except in cases of national self-defense, and American law requires Congress to authorize the executive's war powers.

While the attacks on ISIS have been justified under the 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force in response to 9/11, it's hard to believe that provision covers attacking the Syrian government.

"There's just no (legal) argument that the 2001 AUMF authorizes force against the Assad regime," said Steve Vladeck, a CNN legal analyst and national security law professor, in 2017 about Trump's actions then. 

Hina Shamsi, the director of the ACLU National Security Project, made similar comments to the Guardian.

“The use of chemical weapons against civilians is horrific, but the fact is that Trump’s military action violates the Constitution and U.S. treaty obligations under the UN charter,” she said. “There’s no legitimate domestic or international law basis for it, and it’s telling that the administration hasn’t even tried to provide one.”

A year later, the U.S. is in almost exactly the same position. And without congressional action, it will remain highly questionable whether there's any constitutional basis for Trump to attack Syria at all.

#story_page_post_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.