MSNBC's Rachel Maddow Explains Why Trump's VA Pick Is Likely a Historic Disaster

President Donald Trump's pick to be the next secretary of Veterans Affairs, Ronny Jackson, is facing a wave of criticism over his lack of relevant experience and emerging allegations of professional misconduct, but reports suggest that he has no intention of withdrawing his name from consideration.

As MSNBC's Rachel Maddow explained, this situation could lead to a historic nomination battle on the floor of the Senate.

"Not only to VA nominees tend to get confirmed by overwhelming numbers, VA numbers always get confirmed unanimously," Maddow said, citing the reporting of the Military Times' Leo Shane. "There have been precisely zero 'no' votes against nominees to the Veterans Administration out of the Senate in the past 30 years. That's because there is a robust tradition of bipartisan consensus on veteran's issues."

But Trump is threatening this consensus by choosing Jackson, the White House physician with whom he happens to have a personal relationship. Trump does not appear to have consulted the senators on the Senate Committee for Veterans Affairs, as has historically been done.

Since both parties care about providing quality service to veterans, it makes sense that the department hasn't been the site of intense ideological battles in the past. With the nomination of Jackson and the disregard for the Senate comittee's input, it appears Trump may have shattered that tradition. 

Watch the clip below: 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.