South Carolina's Horrendous New Anti-Abortion Rights Bill Could Put Women's Rights in Peril

The battle over abortion rights in South Carolina continued this week, with legislation moving through the Senate Judiciary Committee that intends to end legal abortion in the state. As the “Personhood Act of South Carolina” now goes to South Carolina’s Senate, the restrictions proposed are expected to lead to a larger debate.  

The Personhood Act seeks to end all abortions, including those that would terminate pregnancies that result from rape or incest. As The State reported, the bill would “extend legal rights to fertilized eggs at the moment of conception.” 

This component is one of the most controversial portions of the legislation. The bill’s proponent, Richard Cash, responded to a theoretical example in which an 11-year-old was impregnated after a rape: “If a child is raped, yes, that is a horrible act,” Cash said. “Two wrongs don’t make a right. You cannot erase the rape by killing the child. The child is an innocent person,” he stated.

This legislation is part of larger efforts to restrict access to abortion and define when life begins. Abortions after 20 weeks have been banned in South Carolina since 2016. The Personhood Act is supported by Governor Henry McMaster, who stated during his State of the State speech in January, “I believe that human life begins at conception. That’s why, in August, I directed state agencies to stop providing state funds to abortion clinics.”

McMaster went on to say, “This right to life is the most precious of rights, and the most fragile. We must never let it be taken for granted.”

There will now be a full South Carolina Senate vote on the bill, which Democrats oppose. Of the Senate Judiciary Committee, the vote was divided between parties, with one Republican abstaining.

Prior points of contention raised included the issue of eggs in fertility treatments, and abortions during medical emergencies. An amendment was added that accounts for abortions performed in case of medical emergencies; however, the language around this is vague. As The Hill reported, it “would make an exception for ‘unintended’ death if the doctor makes ‘reasonable medical efforts’ to save the life of both the mother and child.”

Democrat Thomas McElveen said there are too many unknowns in regards to the legislation. “I don’t think the authors of this bill and the authors of this amendment have considered the consequences,” McElveen said.

The amendment to the bill does not address fertility treatments like IVF. As the Greenville News reported, Cash said fertilized eggs should not be thrown away, but that the Personhood Act does not address IVF.

In addition to the previous ban on abortions after 20 weeks, there is another piece of embattled legislation currently in committee, titled the South Carolina Unborn Child Protection from Dismemberment Abortion Act. The bill seeks to outlaw an abortion procedure that, as The State reported, “doctors consider the safest method of second-trimester abortions.”

Planned Parenthood Votes! South Atlantic has been calling for opposition to the so-called Dismemberment Act and the Personhood Act.

While the new legislation continues to infringe on reproductive choice, for Republicans in support of the bill, it’s part of a much longer political plan to push back against Roe V. Wade, the landmark case marking its 45th anniversary.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.