Hope Hicks Could Be in Big Legal Trouble Over Don Jr.'s Emails

A former Watergate prosecutor said White House communications director Hope Hicks could be in legal jeopardy if she suggested destroying emails related to Donald Trump Jr.’s meeting with Russians.

Nick Akerman, a former U.S. Attorney who prosecuted the Watergate case, agreed with former Trump legal team spokesman Mark Corallo that Hicks may have been contemplating a crime when she told lawyers the emails “will never get out,” as the New York Timesreported.

“It’s all part of the obstruction of justice,” Akerman told MNSBC’s Stephanie Ruhle. “I mean, this by itself doesn’t prove obstruction of justice, but when you take it in combination with all of the surrounding circumstances — the memo, the excuse that was written up by Donald Trump for his son, as to why that meeting even took place. The nonsense that it was just about adoption, when it was really not just about adoption, which really talked about the Magnitsky Act, and goes to the sanctions, which his one of the critical issues here, which of course was never mentioned in that statement.”

“Then, when you take it and juxtapose it to the (Jared) Kushner statement — I mean, the whole thing smells of a cover-up,” Akerman added.

Hicks’ attorney strongly denied Corallo’s account — although the Trump legal team spokesman told the Times he took notes about the conversation — and Akerman said Mueller would likely try to flip the president’s close aide.

“She’d be a great witness, there’s no question about it,” Akerman said. “I think all of these people are open to being flipping. There’s nobody there to super loyal Donald Trump if it comes down to it’s either them or him.”

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.