A Giant Step Backward on the Treatment of Orcas in Captivity

It was my great hope that SeaWorld’s March 2016 decision to end its orca breeding and theatrical performance shows would be a catalyst prompting all other marine theme parks to get on board and move to the next, better chapter in our relationship with cetaceans. We imagined that the company’s commitment would close the chapter on the days of capturing or breeding them for public display and behavioral stunts. Once that chapter finally closed, future generations would look back with befuddlement that for so long human beings kept some of the most intelligent and awe-inspiring creatures on the planet in small pools, never intending to let them swim free again.

Media reports have now come to light about a situation that threatens to prolong the era of captive display of orcas. Loro Parque Zoo, based on the island of Tenerife in Spain, took custody of a rescued female orca named Morgan in 2011, and stories appearing this week have stated that Morgan is pregnant.

Most wild orca populations are not listed as endangered, and captivity does the species no good at any level as a hedge against extinction. On top of that, the sad and sorry past history of breeding and keeping orcas in captivity leaves little room for optimism. It’s one thing to take in an animal in trouble and provide lifesaving care, which is how Morgan ended up in captivity. It’s another matter to impregnate an orca in a captive setting, knowing that the newborn will never find a pod and will probably never swim a mile in a day, let alone 50 or 100 miles, as many orcas do.

Several organizations closely involved in following her plight have raised concerns about Morgan’s health. Adding the rigors of a long gestation to all of that is unlikely to do anything but tax her system and weaken her further.

In March 2016, SeaWorld, rocked by the crisis surrounding the death of trainer Dawn Brancheau and the documentary "Blackfish" took a bold and difficult step, ending its orca breeding and theatrical orca performance shows. The HSUS praised SeaWorld’s decision, and since then we’ve worked together on anti-shark finning campaigns and kept an open and productive dialogue. The company is holding up its side of a shared commitment to forging a legislative and public education agenda to make the oceans safer and healthier for a number of marine species.

Morgan’s dilemma stems from a 2006 agreement that resulted in the transfer of four orcas from SeaWorld to Loro Parque, and her own transfer to Loro Parque from a Dutch dolphinarium that had her in its custody after her rescue.

For the last year, we have been advocating that SeaWorld challenge attempts by Loro Parque to breed Morgan with any of the orcas it transferred there. But SeaWorld recently decided to end its relationship with Loro Parque and to abandon its efforts to dissuade the zoo from breeding orcas.

This places Morgan and the other whales at the mercy of Loro Parque, which, like SeaWorld, had a chance to embrace the high ground by making a commitment not to breed orcas.

Right now, we’re worried about the health of Morgan and her baby. But we’re also outraged by Loro Parque’s rejection of the understanding we reached with SeaWorld. What the team at Loro Parque is doing cuts against the swell of feeling that keeping orcas in captivity is an enterprise that should be phased out with all deliberate speed.

P.S. Today the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals will hear oral arguments in a lawsuit that will determine the fate of Lolita, the only captive individual of the endangered Southern Resident distinct population segment of orcas. Lolita’s been in captivity at Miami Seaquarium for nearly five decades. Plaintiffs, supported by an amicus curiae brief from HSUS attorneys, have asserted that keeping her in a woefully small and shallow tank with incompatible dolphins and inadequate shelter from the blistering sun harms and harasses Lolita in violation of the federal Endangered Species Act.

This article was originally published on Wayne Pacelle's blog, A Humane Nation.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.