New Israel Labour Leader Excites Some, but What Can He Offer the Palestinians?

The occupation and comatose peace process were not a central part of Gabbay’s campaign.

Avi Gabbay was elected leader of Israel’s Labour Party, seeing off the trade union-backed Amir Peretz in a run-off. Outgoing leader Isaac Herzog went out in the first round.

Gabbay’s win marked an extraordinary political journey for the former CEO of telecom­munications company Bezeq, who had only joined Labour six months earlier. Indeed, it was barely a year ago that Gabbay — then part of Kulanu — resigned his ministerial position in Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netan­yahu’s government.

The combination of Gabbay’s outsider image — as well as being a newcomer to Labour, he is a Mizrahi — his relative young age (50, 17 years younger than Netanyahu) and business background, prompted some to compare him to French President Emmanuel Macron. Others say that Gabbay will revive the fortunes of the Labour Party, which has not won an election since 1999.

Such hopes were boosted when the Labour-dominated Zionist Camp opposition bloc showed an immediate rise in polls following Gabbay’s leadership election on July 10. Yet the high end of Zionist Camp’s predicted haul — 20-24 seats — would only match its showing in the 2015 election.

Gabbay faces an uphill battle to become Israel’s prime minister. Labour/Zionist Camp may gain at the expense of Yair Lapid’s Yesh Atid but most of the Israeli electorate’s recent movement has been within, rather than across, right-wing and centrist blocs. Netanyahu remains well ahead of his rivals with respect to whom Israelis see as most suited to be prime minister.

What does this mean for the Palestinians? The occupation and comatose peace process were not a central part of Gabbay’s cam­paign but there are clues. He has backed transferring areas of occu­pied East Jerusalem annexed by Israel to Palestinian Authority control. “These are isolated areas and villages that can be returned without hurting security,” he said.

At the same time, Gabbay insisted: “Jerusalem will remain united in any scenario. There can be no negotiations over that.”

In a post-victory interview, Gabbay described Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas as “definitely a partner.” However, in May he told the Jerusalem Post that, while Israel must initiate negotiations with the Palestin­ians unilaterally, he doubted whether it would be possible to achieve a final status deal with Abbas. “I don’t want the world to see us as the side that is refusing to reach an agreement,” he said.

Gabbay has said he would cut off funding for more isolated settlements in the West Bank while asserting that the “Jordan Valley must be part of the country’s eastern security belt in any deal.” On his website, Gabbay wrote that the conflict with the Palestinians “is solvable” but would need “courageous and determined leadership,” a comment, which is, of course, rather vague.

While his resignation last year, in protest at the removal of Moshe Ya’alon as defence minister and the entry into the coalition of Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beitenu, seems to suggest a man of principle, it has been noted that Gabbay did not publicly object, ahead of the 2015 elections, to the surplus-vote agreement made between his Kulanu party and Yisrael Beitenu.

When he resigned in May 2016, Gabbay said Israel “has the right to have a right-wing government but I do not think it is right to form an extremist government.” Furthermore, as i24 News pointed out, “during Netanyahu’s coalition, he had no problem being part of a coalition expand­ing settlements and opposing the peace process.”

Overall, Gabbay’s position on the Palestinian question seems more or less consistent with the platform endorsed by the Labour Party last year, which effectively booted the two-state solution into the long grass and endorsed Herzog’s proposal for unilateral “separation.”

A Palestine Liberation Organi­sation official reportedly declared Gabby “an honest man of peace.” This says more about the Ramal­lah leadership’s desperation than it does about the new Labour leader’s likely impact, given the Palestinians’ current choice of the status quo, annexation or Bantustan-style separation.

Gabbay may have excited Labour voters but for Palestinians experiencing Israeli occupation and apartheid first-hand, it all seems wearingly familiar.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.