Anderson Cooper Can Only Laugh at the Trump Administration's Defenders at This Point

Before he tweeted out his email chain with lawyer Natalia Veselnitskaya, Donald Trump Jr. offered a dizzying explanation for his meeting with the Kremlin-connected lawyer during the 2016 presidential campaign. On Monday, CNN's Anderson Cooper held a panel discussion with communication members from both major party presidential campaigns, as well as a former conservative U.S. attorney to dissect the latest revelations.

The general consensus? It doesn't look good, regardless of whether or not Don Jr. received the damaging information on Hillary Clinton he was promised. 

"Donald Trump [Jr.] accepted a meeting; no one forced him to show up at the meeting," noted Brian Fallon, Clinton's former campaign press secretary. "He showed up at the meeting and asked for the information that he was told might be of benefit." 

"We do not know who solicited what," Cooper cut in. Since "this is all from a statement of Donald Trump Jr." 

"Right, right," former Trump campaign communications director Jason Miller agreed. "So, Brian can't say that [Trump Jr.] was soliciting and therefore potentially breaking some law, when he wasn't soliciting. I mean, none of us were there—"

"Why was he at the meeting?" Fallon asked incredulously. "By his own admission in this statement, he said he showed up at this at the meeting because he thought that the lawyer was going to provide some information that could benefit the Trump campaign."

The New York Times first reported the motivation behind the meeting on Sunday. But Miller insisted that the quality of Veselnitskaya's findings, "vague" and "ambiguous" according to the president's son, proved Trump Jr.'s innocence.

"There was nothing," he told Fallon. 

"You're sidestepping the point, Jason," Fallon shot back. "[He] showed up because he thought he'd get something. He showed up because he'd been promised dirt on Hillary Clinton and he showed up in order to be in receipt of it. And not only that, he brought his brother-in-law and the chairman of the campaign because he thought the information might be so helpful."


Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.