One Email Doesn't Harm the Environment - But Humanity Sends 200 Billion a Day

Finding ways to reduce our carbon footprint grows more urgent by the day. In some cases this means turning to technology to find greener alternatives to forms of solid waste such as paper. But as French energy regulators RTE recently announced, even that practice may need to change.

In its public statement, RTE called on companies to send fewer emails in an attempt to reduce energy usage. This may sound a bit extreme, but it’s worth considering the figures. Radicati, a technology research firm, reports that in 2015 alone the world sent and received a total of over 205 billion emails a day. By 2019, estimates Radicati, that number will rise to over 246 billion.

So why is this bad news for the environment? Mike Berners-Lee lays out the reason in his book, How Bad are Bananas? The Carbon Footprint of Everything. Berners-Lee explains that an average email has a carbon footprint of 4g, with that figure varying from a low of 0.3g for spam to emails with larger attachments that can use up as much as 50g of CO2. These figures relate to the total power computers and data centers use to send, filter and open these messages.

Berners-Lee put this number into greater perspective writing for the Guardian. “A typical year of incoming mail for a business user,” he wrote, generates a carbon footprint of roughly 297 lbs (135 kg). “That's over 1% of of a relatively green 10-ton lifestyle and equivalent to driving 200 miles in an average car.”

Changing this situation will take a concerted effort. That’s not to suggest asking people to stop sending emails. Instead, like many other daily rituals and routines that need adjustment, it’s about being more conscious of your impact. So, the next time you get one of those dumb chain mails, think twice before sending it to “10 of your closest friends.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.