Is the Deep State Our Only Control Over Trump?

This article originally appeared at The Huffington Post.

A funny thing happened to Donald Trump in recent weeks. He had an encounter with reality—and reality won. 

It is one thing to dwell in your own reality during the campaign and to persuade your true believers that real is fake and fake is real. But when you actually try to govern, there is a reality to reality, and it pushes back.

It turns out that the budget, and the Syrian civil war, and North Korean nuclear ambitions, and relations with China, and with Mexico, and with the EU are, like health insurance … complicated.

As Trump put it so well, who knew? Evidently, everyone knew but Trump.

And it turns out that the United States can’t just insult China willy-nilly, because maybe we need China’s help to contain North Korea. It turns out that there is a direct connection between the Syrian civil war, the refugee crisis, and the looming collapse of the EU.

It isn’t that NATO got real about the refugee crisis, or Russian aspirations in the Baltics and in Ukraine, because Trump made a few disparaging comments. The NATO alliance was there all along. Who knew?

Trump also discovered that he could not govern by whim and by decree. The Constitution held.

He realized he could not defy court orders on immigration. He could not compel Republicans in Congress to support him by threatening the likes of Representative Mark Meadows, head of the Freedom Caucus: “I’m coming after you.” Meadows had his own electoral base over which Trump had no leverage. Who knew?

And he discovered that if he puts forth a budget completely disconnected from reality, even Republicans are going to push back. It was Republicans who pronounced the Trump budget “dead on arrival.”

Steve Bannon was basically right about the deep state—otherwise known as the U.S. Constitution and the permanent establishment.

Once Michael Flynn self-destructed, leaders like National Security Adviser H.R. McMaster and Defense Secretary James Mattis also began injecting an overdue dose of reality into the Trump presidency.

The defense establishment is part of the Deep State. So are the courts. So is the reality of separation of powers.

Likewise the fact that the FBI and the CIA, whatever their other missteps, are not about to become Trump’s private secret police. They are part of the deep state, too

Of course, even if we are spared a Trump dictatorship or an impulsive Trump nuclear war, Trump will do immense damage by having appointed cabinet figures such as Secretary of Education Betsy DeVos and HHS Secretary Tom Price. They are not quite white-nationalist; they are just corporate far right. But that’s damaging enough. And he will do immense damage by appointing far-right judges.

And while financial industry figures such as chief economic adviser Gary Cohn and Secretary of the Treasury Steve Mnuchin are reining in Trump’s nuttier impulses on the economy, they are of course both from Goldman Sachs. And the permanent lock that Goldman has on the Treasury Department and on catastrophic financialization of the economy is also part of the deep state.

So, the good news/bad news net-net looks something like this:

Good news: Reality and the deep state stop Trump well short of fascism.

Bad news: We have, instead, a conventional, far-right Republican presidency, led by a stunningly incompetent sociopath.

Good news: The Republican Party keeps fragmenting—into Tea Party and Main Street factions on domestic policy, Putin-apologist and Putin-abhoring factions on foreign policy, and white nationalist factions and Wall Street globalist factions on economics. That can only weaken Trump.

Bad news: Despite Trump’s faux populism, the Wall Street lock on the political economy has never been stronger. One face of fascism is political dictatorship; the other is a corporate state.

Good news and bad news: Nothing that Trump is likely to do will change the economic situation of the downtrodden middle- and working-class Americans who voted for Trump out of disgust with the status quo.

Whether Trump’s failure to improve that reality leads to a progressive form of populism or to deeper frustration and white nationalism depends on whether Democrats rise to the occasion—whether they can shed the Wall Street captivity that pervaded both the Clinton and Obama presidencies, and the Hillary Clinton campaign.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.