8 Reasons the Senate Must Reject Jeff Sessions

On Capitol Hill on Tuesday, the Senate Judiciary Committee held confirmation hearings to consider the first of Donald Trump’s cabinet nominations, Sen. Jefferson B. Sessions of Alabama. Twenty-six years ago, this same committee denied Sessions a recommendation for the federal bench. “Most of Reagan’s judicial appointments have been people with impressive credentials regardless of their ideologies,” the editors of the LA Times wrote. “Sessions is a different story.”


The Senate refused to confirm Sessions in 1986 because the testimony they heard suggested that he sided with his namesake, Jefferson Davis, over America’s commitment to equal protection under the law. A quarter century later, the Senate must decide if Sessions has changed.

Senator Sessions’ record suggests a remarkable consistency in support of policies that contradict and subvert the Reconstruction amendments to the U.S. Constitution, which guarantee citizenship, equal protection under the law, and the ballot to all Americans.

If the photo of Senator Sessions greeting Donald Trump’s so-called thank-you tour in Mobile, Alabama, alongside Southern belles in hoop skirts isn’t enough to make clear what his support of Trump hearkens back to, then the nation should listen to the question of one civil rights veteran from Alabama who asked, in the language of Scripture, “Can a leopard change his spots?”

The record is clear. Here are eight reasons why the Senate must reject Sessions.

If Jefferson B. Sessions were confirmed by the Senate in 2017, we would have have an attorney general who, as a senator:

  1. Applauded the Supreme Court’s 2013 Shelby County v. Holder decision, which gutted key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1865. 
  2. Voted against reauthorizing the Violence Against Women Act. 
  3. Voted yes on a constitutional ban of same-sex marriage. 
  4. Opposed the repeal of “don’t ask, don’t tell.” 
  5. Opposed the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act. 
  6. Voted to ease restrictions on wiretapping of cell phones. 
  7. Voted to abolish a program that helps businesses owned by women and minorities compete for federally funded transportation projects. 
  8. Opposed comprehensive immigration reform and nearly every immigration bill that has come before the Senate over the past two decades, including voting against a Senate resolution affirming that the United States must not bar people from the country because of their religion.

The positions and policies Sessions has supported do not uplift America’s shared values of love, justice and mercy, despite his trappings of respectability and declarations of faith. He has neither repented of his wrongdoing nor committed to change. So we must reject his nomination and the nomination of any candidate for attorney general who poses a threat to equal justice and the freedoms we hold dear.

Like George Wallace before him, Jeff Sessions is a faithful member of the United Methodist Church in Alabama. But he has not in half a century of public life demonstrated any willingness to turn from evil and learn to do good.

When those who wield the power of the state deprive the people of these freedoms, citizens in general and the U.S. Department of Justice in particular must resist their injustice and hold them accountable. Senator Sessions is clearly unfit for the role of attorney general.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close