Paul Krugman Reveals the 'Real Sinners' Behind Trump

Paul Krugman is incredulous about the mounting horrors of the Trump campaign and spends his Monday column once again trying to inject some reasonable thinking into the debate about how to vote come November. Depressingly, he notes that a YouGov survey just found that "61 percent of Republicans support his call for Russian hacking of Hillary Clinton," which doesn't bode well for how Republicans feel about his criticisms of a Muslim war hero's family.


But ever fair-minded, Krugman notes that there is, after all, a significant minority within the Republican party that is not racist, who think international commitments are important and who are just, well, normal people. "Yet the great majority of these not-crazy Republicans are still supporting Mr. Trump for president. And we have a right to ask why," he writes.
True, a Clinton victory would mean a continuation of the center-left governance we’ve had under Barack Obama, which would be a big disappointment for those who want a turn to the right. And many people have convinced themselves that ideology aside, Mrs. Clinton would be a bad president. Obviously I disagree on the ideology, and while we won’t know about a Clinton presidency until or unless it happens, I find much to admire in the real Hillary, who is nothing like the caricature. But never mind: even if you’re a conservative who really dislikes the Democratic candidate, how can you justify choosing Donald Trump?

How, Krugman wonders, have people convinced themselves that Clinton would be a disaster as President, when no clear-eyed analysis comes close to demonstrating that? He continues:

Start with the least important issue (even if it is my specialty), economics. If you’re a Republican, you presumably believe that center-left policies — higher taxes on top incomes, a big subsidized expansion of health insurance, tighter financial regulation — are bad for the economy. But even if you think the Obama economy should have been better, the fact is that we’ve added 11 million private-sector jobs; stocks are way up; inflation and interest rates have stayed low; the budget deficit has withered away.

So it’s not a disaster, and there’s no reason to believe that a Clinton economy would be a disaster either. Meanwhile, Mr. Trump is talking about wildly irresponsible tax cuts, renegotiating debt, and ripping up trade agreements.
Similarly, it is very hard to argue that Clinton would be a disaster on matters of national security, especially compared to a man who cozies up to dictators, "talks about abandoning NATO allies if they don’t pay up and seems fine with Russian adventurism in Ukraine."
For Krugman and many others, the worst threat Trump poses is to our very democracy. There just is no comparison between what some call Obama's overstepping of his authority to get things done over the objections of a totally obstructionist Congress. Neither Obama, nor his proposed successor pose a danger to basic liberty or act like, or express admiration for dictators.
Realistically, a Clinton presidency is not going to be disastrous, even for Republicans. In Krugman's eyes, a vote for Trump is virtually a "dereliction of duty" for ordinary citizens. "And whatever one may say about ordinary voters, the real sinners here are Republican leaders — people like Paul Ryan and Mitch McConnell — who are actively supporting a candidate who they know poses a danger to the nation."

 There are times, Krugman points out, when party loyalty should and must take a back seat.

This is one of them.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.