Recent Polls Find 2016 Could Be Shaping Up As Wave That Widely Ousts Republicans

A down-ballot wave sweeping Republicans out of federal and state office may be taking shape as Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress continue to alienate swaths of the voting public, according to a recent series of polls by Democracy Corps.

“This just might be such an election,” they reported Monday. “The Republican brand… is badly tarnished.”

The firm, led by Democrats Stan Greenberg and James Carville, last week released a national poll taken in late June that found Hillary Clinton 11 percentage points ahead of Trump, which matches her largest lead in national polls.

More intriguingly, that poll hinted that Democrats were gaining strength as many voters said they were inclined to cast straight party line votes for November’s entire Democrats ticket, and a sizable number of Republicans were willing to vote for Democrats running for Congress.

“It showed the Democrats with an eight-point lead… something we have not seen since June of 2009,” they said. “It is also the first time that we have seen the presidential margin [Clinton’s lead] exceed the Democrats’ party identification advantage [straight-party voting].

That means more voters who previously voted for Republican presidents are willing to break that pattern this year. But it is not just in the presidential race, they said, and cited another recent poll of nearly 3,000 people in nine presidential battleground states that delved into the reason why.

“In Democracy Corps’ nine-state battleground survey… it did not take much for those not currently supporting the Democratic Senate candidate to say, enough!”

Once the pollsters “pointed out that ‘Republicans in Congress and in their own state legislature’” oppose “abortion even in case of rape and incest”...“oppose restricting gun rights for people on the terror watch list”...“oppose gay marriage and new laws barring discrimination,” and, “oppose new laws guaranteeing equal pay for women,” a stunning turnaround followed.    

“After hearing that information, one-third of those not voting for the Senate Democratic candidate said they would vote for the Democrat, and one in four said they were ‘very certain’ to change their vote,” they reported. “That is a breathtaking number, and we now believe we are onto something—something that Republicans figured out when they used Obamacare in the off-year elections of 2010 and 2014… It allowed them to say, ‘vote against the Democrats because of Obamacare, not because I want a political party to win.’”

In other words, in a season where voters are not showing great loyalty to parties as galvanizing institutions, the spectrum of extremist stances taken by the GOP in Congress and in the presidential campaign is prompting voters to discard usual party labels and look at where candidates stand on issues that are important to them.

And it is not just in the presidential election.

“The information [on gun control, pay equity, abortion and LGBT equality] also immediately consolidated the potential Democratic vote down-ballot,” they said. “It moved three-quarters of Clinton voters who were not yet supporting the Democrat in the race for Senate; it shifted half of the Rising American Electorate not yet voting for the Democrat, including half of the millennials and unmarried women. It is clearly giving Democratically inclined voters a reason to vote straight-ticket.”

The Republican focus and opposition to “abortion, sensible gun limits, and equality for the LGBT community and women, both in Congress and out state legislature, is emotional, real, motivating and allows Democrats to consolidate their broad base in a potentially big election,” they said.

While pollsters conclude by adding qualifiers, such as the need to do more polling, especially of the public’s response to “other parts of the conservative agenda,” they end on a more hopeful note than one might expect in a political season marked by widespread discontent.

“We hope this contributes to the strategic conversation among progressives,” they concluded.
 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.