alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.

Bob Woodward Smacks Down Bill O'Reilly's Complaints Over 'Feminists' Reporting on Trump

Washington Post associate editor Bob Woodward wasn’t buying into Bill O’Reilly’s argument that feminists should not report on Donald Trump, Media Matters reported on Tuesday.

“If I’m an editor and I know there is a feminist woman in my newsroom, who is brilliant because I think this woman is an excellent reporter, I don’t let her report on a guy like Trump because Trump is the antithesis of that,” O’Reilly argued. “And so I don’t want any margin of error here, there are plenty of reporters who can do the story. Do you not see that?”

“Yeah, look, I really disagree,” Woodward replied. “There are feminists on the left and the right as you know, and somebody can put their personal feelings and conclusions in their back pocket and keep them there.”

“I guess it’s possible; I haven’t seen it much,” O’Reilly said. “I guess it’s possible.”

O’Reilly argued that the New York Times had erred in allowing Megan Twohey and Michael Barbaro report on Trump’s history of inappropriate remarks toward women.

“She is a feminist. Trump is a beauty contestant purveyor,” O’Reilly said to Woodward. “Do you let a feminist report on a beauty contestant person who is now turned politician?”

“Well, of course. That doesn’t condemn somebody and say they can’t report on X or Y. Somebody is a conservative or a liberal, that doesn’t mean they can’t report,” Woodward responded. “As we learn over the decades, the best reporters may have feelings and personal conclusions, and they can edit those and filter those things out.”

“Maybe so, but there were a lot of charged words in that article,” O’Reilly insisted.

Watch the exchange, as posted by Media Matters on Tuesday, below.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.