The Internet Thinks Only White Hairstyles Are Appropriate for the Office

Q: What’s the best way to appear professional?


A: Dye yourself white. And make sure your hair approximates whiteness as best it can, too.

That’s according to Google Images, at least. Twitter user ‏@BonKamona posted the results of a search via Google for “professional hairstyles.” She repeated the experiment by image-searching “unprofessional hairstyles” on the platform.

The difference between the results? Race.

The former turned up white women while the latter turned up black women. For the racists who will surely weigh in here with some endlessly dumb contribution, I’ll just proactively point out that there’s zero about the black women’s hair in the images returned that’s the least bit unprofessional—the pics all depict women with curly natural styles. That’s really the only dividing line.

[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_large","fid":"609851","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image","height":"476","typeof":"foaf:Image","width":"480"}}]]

It’s hard to fully, totally and completely fault Google for this. The Internet is plumb full of idiotic, racist nonsense and it’s likely they input metadata that expresses those racist ideas and aesthetics, resulting in search yields like the one above. As Boing Boing notes:

Google's algorithm is a trade secret, so it's hard to tell where the bias sits between engineering, traditional SEO efforts, link-tracking, etc. The top "professional" headshots link to pinterest boards and inane listicles, whereas the "unprofessional" shots are mostly to serious, aware discussion of the issue of ethnicity, hair and professional environments.

A Google spokesperson talked to the U.K.’s Metro and sort of said the same thing, only in boilerplate-ish, communications-speak:

This is fundamentally a societal problem—there are persistent and problematic biases, and they’re quite pervasive in the media, on the web, etc.—meta-tagging their images with their own descriptions. Search engines in turn reflect what’s on the web. This is not unique to our search engine; Yahoo! and Bing show similar results. We welcome feedback and we’re always working to improve our search results. As a company we strongly value a diversity of perspectives, ideas and cultures—these search results do not reflect Google’s view on the matter.

Sure. Although another Twitter user pointed out that Bing actually doesn't offer the same results. Do a search for professional hair images there and you'll get a more diverse pool of returns. Just a thing to note!

[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_large","fid":"609852","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image","height":"480","typeof":"foaf:Image","width":"264"}}]]

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.