CBS Exec Brags How Trump Is Great for Ratings, That He's Terrible for the Country Is an Afterthought

CBS CEO Les Moonves, who in December said of GOP presidential candidate Donald Trump, “Go Donald! Keep getting out there!” because “the more they spend, the better it is for us (Intercept ; FAIR.org),” had more to say about the business of politics at another investors’ conference, as The Intercept‘s Lee Fang (2/29/16) reported.


Speaking to the Morgan Stanley Technology, Media and Telecom Conference at San Francisco’s Park Hotel, Moonves observed that “in local [broadcasting], the No. 1 word is ‘political’ [advertising],” and continued:

Man, who would have expected the ride we’re all having right now? This is pretty amazing…. Who would have thought that this circus would come to town?

But, you know—it may not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS, that’s all I got to say.

So what can I say?  It’s—you know, the money’s rolling in, and this is fun.

Moonves noted that the election has been a boost for ratings—“We had a debate a couple of weeks ago, it was 14 million people on a Saturday night. You know, it’s amazing, that’s all I can say”—but, more importantly, the spending by candidates on political advertising goes directly into CBS’s coffers:

Yeah, [Trump’s] getting a lot of free media, but all that’s happening out there, there’s a lot of money in the marketplace, there’s a lot of money in the marketplace….

They’re not even talking about issues. They’re throwing bombs at each other, and I think the advertising reflects that. Most of the ads are not about issues; they’re sort of like the debates. They’re saying, he did this or he did that. Doesn’t say what I stand for.

I’ve never seen anything like this, and this is going to be a very good year for us. Sorry. It’s a terrible thing to say, but bring it on, Donald, go ahead, keep going.

Moonves did not want his cheering on Trump—whose campaign promotes xenophobia,war crimes and threats of violence against various groups, including journalists—to be mistaken for an endorsement:

I said that at another investor conference, and the next day some blog put out, “Moonves Supporting Trump Wholeheartedly.” I said, no no no, I’m not taking any side. I’m just saying, for us, economically, Donald’s place in this election is a good thing.

Moonves chuckles like a Bond villain as he tells his wealthy audience how his company is profiting at the expense of the nation. It’s not actually all that funny, though, for a television executive to celebrate how a campaign that’s hurting the United States is  driving his network’s profit bonanza. Among CBS’s chief assets are the 16 TV broadcasting licenses it holds, along with its 117 radio station licenses. These licenses each include a public interest clause:

The licensee shall, during the term of this license, render such broadcasting service as will serve the public interest, convenience, or necessity to the full extent of the privileges herein conferred.

When a broadcaster cheers on  the electoral “circus” (“bring it on, Donald, go ahead, keep going”) that he acknowledges “may not be good for America, but it’s damn good for CBS,” can he really be said to be “render[ing] such broadcasting service as will serve the public interest”? Or when he brags about how much money he’s making from running ads that are “not even talking about issues…sort of like the debates”—you know, the ones that his corporation helps put on?

Over decades, the FCC has progressively lowered the standard broadcasters have to meet to fulfill their public interest requirements. But as long as there is any kind of standard, surely “the money’s rolling in, and this is fun” doesn’t meet it.

Hear Les Moonves’ remarks, courtesy of The Intercept:

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close