Four Reasons Why Raising Social Security's Retirement Age Cuts Everyone's Benefits

Some policymakers, including prominent presidential candidates, have endorsed raising Social Security’s full retirement age to improve the program’s long-term solvency. 

Raising the retirement age cuts benefits for all retirees, the cuts could be deep, and they would fall hardest on lower- and middle-income Americans — who rely heavily on their hard-earned Social Security and have not shared equally in recent life expectancy gains.

The full retirement age is the age at which retirees can receive full Social Security benefits.  If you claim benefits before full retirement age, you receive permanently reduced monthly benefits; if you claim them after, you get a permanent increase.  The full retirement age was 65 for most of Social Security’s history.  The last major Social Security overhaul, in 1983, gradually raised it to 66 (where it stands now) and will eventually raise it to 67, a change that effectively cuts benefits by 13 percent.  

There’s talk of moving the age further to 68, 69, or 70.  Such a change would have significant effects.

  1. Raising the retirement age means cutting benefits — no matter when you file. A higher retirement age means that an early retiree gets a deeper reduction and a delayed retiree gets a smaller bonus.  If the age rose from 67 to 68, monthly benefits would fall by about 7 percent, for all new retirees.  If it rose to 70, the cuts would be nearly 20 percent. (See graph.  For more information, see the box, “Why Does Raising the Retirement Age Reduce Benefits?” here.)
  2. Most people claim early, which means they could receive as little as half their full benefit.  Nearly half of retirement beneficiaries claim benefits at age 62.  Some of these beneficiaries — especially those with lower earnings — are in poor health but don’t meet the stringent criteria for disability benefits.  If the retirement age were 70, a retiree at age 62 would receive only 57 percent of his or her full monthly benefit.
  3. Low-income people don’t live as long as high-income people — and the gap is widening.  Supporters of retirement age increases often point to increasing longevity.  And that’s true — for some people.  Average life expectancies are rising, but the gains are mostly among higher-income Americans.  Life expectancy for the bottom half of earners has barely changed over the past 30 years.
  4. Retirement age increases hit the pocketbooks of workers with low and moderate incomes hardest.  Though raising the retirement age cuts everyone’s benefits roughly equally, it affects incomes unequally.  That’s because Social Security benefits make up a greater share of income for low- to middle-income retirees, as well as for minorities.
#story_page_ below_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.