Chipotle’s Mounting Woes Now Include a Federal Criminal Investigation

The fallout from Chipotle’s multiple outbreaks of food-borne illness took an unexpected turn last week when news broke that a norovirus incident in Simi Valley, California, had spurred a federal criminal investigation.


Numerous lawsuits have been filed against the chain, which was also linked to cases of salmonella and E. coli last year that have yet to be linked with any deaths. But while Chipotle has worked closely with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to track the outbreaks, there were no signs of a criminal investigation before the company disclosed the subpoena in a Securities and Exchange Commission report filed on January 6. Typically, it is farmers and food manufacturers, not local chains, that are investigated by federal agencies.

“I have been doing these kinds of cases for 23 years now, and I do not recall a federal investigation of any sort into a one-restaurant outbreak of any kind,” Bill Marler, a prominent food-safety lawyer who is representing victimsof Chipotle’s recent outbreaks, said in an interview. “And I don’t even recall a federal investigation of a restaurant chain that’s involved in any kind of criminal investigation” following an outbreak of food-borne illness, he said. Marler, who got his start representing victims of Jack in the Box’s 1993 E. coli outbreak, said that even then there was no criminal investigation—federal or local. The infamous case killed four children, and some of the 178 survivors who experienced permanent injuries are still coping with brain and kidney damage.

Still, it is neither unheard of nor uncommon for federal criminal charges to be pursued in the wake of a food-safety scandal. Charges were filed following the 2011 listeria outbreak, during which contaminated cantaloupes from a Colorado farm killed more than 33 people. A 2008 salmonella outbreak caused by tainted peanut butter led to nine deaths and sickened 714 people; in 2014, three people tied to the Peanut Corporation of America were found guilty on a host of felony charges, while the two primary defendants face years of jail time when they’re sentenced in July. The Blue Bell ice cream listeria outbreak killed three people, and the company is being investigated by the Justice Department.

But in all of those instances it was a farmer or a food manufacturer that sent contaminated products across state lines (thus making it a federal issue) that was charged.

All of which led Marler to use a “legal term,” as he called it, to describe the federal investigation into the Simi Valley outbreak: “weird.” 

Details are thin at this point, with Chipotle revealing minimal details in its SEC report. The subpoena required the chain to provide investigators with “a broad range of documents related to a Chipotle restaurant in Simi Valley, California, that experienced an isolated norovirus incident during August 2015.” That outbreak sickened at least 234 people.  

Chipotle did not answer questions regarding the involvement of the feds in the investigation. Chris Arnold, the chain’s communications director, wrote in an email, “As a matter of policy, we do not discuss details surrounding pending legal action. We will cooperate fully as the investigation moves forward.” 

The lack of transparency has left Marler, who said he is in touch with Chipotle lawyers daily, grasping at possible reasons for the investigation. “The only thing I can think of is maybe there’s a problem in their workers—like their workers weren’t legal,” he said. “Or, secondly, the feds are looking into communications between Chipotle’s management and corporate headquarters in Colorado and the interstate wires—maybe that invokes federal jurisdiction.”

All Marler could say for sure is that news of the investigation is “raising enormous questions in the minds of my clients.”

This article originally appeared on TakePart.com. Reprinted with permission.

[[{"type":"media","view_mode":"media_original","fid":"606516","attributes":{"alt":"","class":"media-image","height":"280","style":"width: 150px; height: 34px;","typeof":"foaf:Image","width":"1230"}}]]

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.