Paul Krugman: 'If the Planet Is Doomed, It's the Republicans' Fault'

Paul Krugman is in a feisty, somewhat dark mood in Friday’s column. Anticipating that whatever is decided in Paris about climate change will likely be inadequate, he is ready to predict that the world may well be doomed:


And if we are, you know who will be responsible: the Republican Party.

O.K., I know the reaction of many readers: How partisan! How over the top! But what I said is, in fact, the obvious truth. And the inability of our news media, our pundits and our political establishment in general to face up to that truth is an important contributing factor to the danger we face.

He’s not wrong. Anyone who follows the presidential debate knows that “most of the contenders for the Republican presidential nomination are solidly in the anti-science camp.”

There is no parallel for the insanity of the denial of agreed-on science on the part of Republicans. Apparently mainstream politicians in the party subscribe to wild conspiracy theories, and the notion that all of science is somehow perpetrating a giant hoax on the American people. It’s nuts. There is no parallel even among conservative parties in other countries.

It’s true that conservative parties across the West tend to be less favorable to climate action than parties to their left. But in most countries — actually, everywhere except America and Australia — these parties nonetheless support measures to limit emissions. And U.S. Republicans are unique in refusing to accept that there is even a problem. Unfortunately, given the importance of the United States, the extremism of one party in one country has enormous global implications.

By rights, then, the 2016 election should be seen as a referendum on that extremism. But it probably won’t be reported that way. Which brings me to what you might call the problem of climate denial denial.

This is a condition that Krugman diagnoses even among moderate Repubicans, who will line up to support whoever is nominated, crazy extremist views or not, and who will continue to delude themselves that the party will one day talk modicum of sense again.

Dream on.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.