WATCH: Neil deGrasse Tyson Wins Debate With Christian Pastor Using Flawless Argument About Asteroids, Genitals

On Wednesday, the Nightly Show valiantly took on a question that has bedeviled mankind for centuries. 

"The war between science and religion is like one of the oldest wars ... and we're going to solve it tonight!" Larry Wilmore joked to a panel composed of astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson, comedian Tom Papa and Pastor Carl Lentz. 

While Wilmore and the other guests tried to rationalize why advances in science are not incompatible with religious belief, deGrasse Tyson pointed to some unpleasant realities about the natural world that are not suggestive of a kindly deity. 

“Anytime someone describes their understanding of god, it typically involves some statement of benevolence or some kind of kindness,” he said.

“I look out to the universe — and yes, it is filled with mysteries — but it’s also filled with all manner of things that would just as soon have you dead, like asteroid strikes and hurricanes and tornadoes and tsunamis and volcanoes and disease and pestilence,” Tyson said.

Pastor Carl Lentz trotted out the intelligent design argument. "I think God created science, so for me I don't think exploring any of this stuff is bad, I think it's going to lead you to the knowledge that something had to begin this and there's something more."

But Tyson pointed out a problem in that reasoning, evident even in human genitals. “I think of, like, the human body, and I look at what’s going on between our legs,” Tyson said. “There’s like a sewage system and entertainment complex intermingling. No engineer of any intelligence would have designed it that way.”

Watch below: 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.