Nearly 14,000 serious assaults in Los Angeles were recorded as minor offenses by the city’s police department, leading to an inaccurate estimate of violent crime reductions in the city. The discrepancy was reported following a Los Angeles Times investigation of LAPD crime data collected between 2005 and 2012. The newspaper says that the misclassifications took place “during a time when the LAPD was reporting major drops in crime across the city.”
According to the Times investigation, had that data been accurately reported, violent crime tallies for the eight-year period would be 7 percent higher, while serious assaults would increase by 16 percent.
When presented with the errors, LAPD Assistant Chief Michael Moore, who oversees the department’s crime tracking database, told the Times, “We know this can have a corrosive effect on the public's trust of our reporting. That's why we are committed to…eliminating as much of the error as possible."
This is the second time the Times has uncovered problems with the way the LAPD classifies crimes. Last year, following an audit of crime data from a year-long period ending in fall 2013, the newspaper found the city’s police department had classified approximately 1,200 violent crimes as minor offenses. Those misclassified crimes were left out of violent crime totals the department initially made public. With those figures included, the violent crime rate in Los Angeles for that 12-month period would have been 7 percent higher, while aggravated assault figures would have risen 14 percent.
In response to those findings, the LAPD said it had made a number of corrective efforts to ensure proper crime classification. The latest misclassifications suggest the system may require even more adjustments.
The Times emphasized that the erroneously categorized offenses “were not numerous enough to alter the overall downward trend” in crime.
There have been complaints that in weekly meetings, police higher-ups have placed too much pressure on captains to reduce crime figures in their districts. Moore conceded to the Times that the tone in those meetings can be “condescending” and “too pressure cooked.”
Enjoy this piece?
… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.
It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.
Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.