FBI Admits Lack of Data on Police Shootings Is "Embarrassing," "Ridiculous"

At a private gathering of more than a 100 law enforcement officials and politicians, FBI Director James Comey addressed the FBI's lack of data on shootings by local police. 

"It is unacceptable that The Washington Post and the Guardian newspaper from the U.K. are becoming the lead source of information about violent encounters between police and civilians. That is not good for anybody." Comey said according to The Washington Post,

Currently, the FBI's tracking system for local police shootings is entirely voluntary. Only 18,000 police departments participate, or roughly 3% of the national total, rendering the system statistically meaningless. The Guardian's database shows 891 have been killed thus far in 2015 while The Washington Post currently shows the number to be 758.  This is more than double what the FBI's figures are.

"You can get online today and figure out how many tickets were sold to ‘The Martian,'" Comey said according to The Post. "The CDC can do the same with the flu, It’s ridiculous — it’s embarrassing and ridiculous — that we can’t talk about crime in the same way, especially in the high-stakes incidents when your officers have to use force.”

Despite the rhetoric, it's unclear if Comey recommends any specific legislation, though it appears the sentiment at the meeting was in favor of reform. The FBI, for its part, has been hesitant to use its authority to investigate local police shootings; they've yet to intervene in any high-profile police killings since the Black Lives Matter movement emerged in 2013. 

h/t The Washington Post 

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.