Wife of Murdered Cop Wakes Up to Prison System and How Drug War Led to Husband’s Death

Washington D.C. — In 2005, San Leandro police officer Nels “Dan” Niemi was gunned down by Irving Alexander Ramirez, a 23-year-old who’d been in and out of prisons on multiple drugs charges.

Not surprisingly, the system that claimed to rehabilitate Ramirez for his drug dealing habit, failed miserably. Instead of helping out a drug-addicted young man, Ramirez’ multiple stays in prison turned him into a hardened criminal unafraid to take another man’s life.

When Officer Niemi showed up to the call where Ramirez was, it was for a noise complaint. However, Ramirez was on probation for a drug offense, and he was not going back to prison. He shot and killed Dan Niemi.

Originally, Niemi’s wife, Dionne Wilson, was angry and had nothing but hate and contempt for Ramirez, who robbed her of her husband and their future together. Wilson pushed for the death penalty for Ramirez, and she was successful in her pursuit.

However, now that Ramirez is waiting to be killed by a California prison, Wilson says his death would bring her no joy.

Wilson, whose husband was gunned down in the line of duty, was able to see how the flawed system of mass incarceration creates more criminals than it stops.

“I was really wrong about how our system works,” she told the crowd at the Fair Justice Summit in Washington D.C. on Wednesday.

When her husband was killed, Wilson wondered how it was possible that a criminal like that could be free. However, now she sees it from an entirely different perspective. Wilson now questions why he ever went into prison in the first place.

“I can’t help but think how my life would be different, and my children’s lives would be different… had we passed Proposition 47 years before,” she said.

Proposition 47 was one of the most damning blows to the state’s immoral war on drugs which reduced, across the board, the classification of most “nonserious and nonviolent property and drug crimes” from a felony to a misdemeanor. California became the first state in the country to stop kidnapping people for possessing arbitrary substances.

There is zero justification for kidnapping someone and locking them in a cage for choosing to partake in an arbitrary substance deemed “illegal” by the state. Locking people in prison, even for non-crimes such as drug possession, guarantees a drastic increase in that person’s chances of ending up in the criminal justice system again.

This vicious cycle is so well known that it has its own word, recidivism.

“I don’t think that anyone can tell me that had we invested in people over prisons, my husband wouldn’t be here today,” Wilson said as she drew obvious attention to the corporatist prison model in the United States.

Instead of focusing on why people “reenter” the prison system, Wilson brought up the innovation notion of “no entry.” Wilson proposed a radical but logical idea “that people never enter the system, that we stop feeding this system of mass incarceration. Stop punishing people for self-medicating trauma with drugs and alcohol, stop punishing people for mental illness. These policies don’t work,” Wilson said, “The promise of public safety has not helped.”

Wilson’s words are based in sound science. Study after study shows the harmful effects of a society with such a high rate of incarceration.

Allison Schrager, at qz.com recently broke down yet another study on recidivism:

A new paper from University of Michigan economics professor Michael Mueller-Smith measures how much incapacitation reduced crime. He looked at court records from Harris County, Texas from 1980 to 2009. Mueller-Smith observed that in Harris County people charged with similar crimes received totally different sentences depending on the judge to whom they were randomly assigned. Mueller-Smith then tracked what happened to these prisoners. He estimated that each year in prison increases the odds that a prisoner would reoffend by 5.6% a quarter. Even people who went to prison for lesser crimes wound up committing more serious offenses subsequently, the more time they spent in prison. His conclusion: Any benefit from taking criminals out of the general population is more than off-set by the increase in crime from turning small offenders into career criminals.

High recidivism rates are not unique to Texas: Within five years of release more than 75 percent of prisoners are arrested again.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.