When It Comes to Extreme Positions on Choice, Jeb Bush Is Really His Own Man
Jeb Bush spent a lot of time this week trying to convince us that he’s different than his brother.
His amateurish efforts to set himself apart on Iraq are cringeworthy and incoherent. And it’s painfully obvious that his campaign won’t be getting by without a little help from his big brother’s billionaire friends.
But for all the bungled attempts to resolve his ever-present identity crisis, Jeb is right about one thing:
When it comes to choice, he is “his own man.”
The truth is that when George W. was president a little over a decade ago, we were living in a different time for the Republican Party. In that pre-transvaginal ultrasound, pre-“legimate rape” GOP era, someone like Olympia Snowe could be elected to the Senate and someone like George W. Bush could run for president without declaring himself to be anti-choice even in cases of rape, incest, or when the woman’s life is at stake. As president, he could even get away without cutting funding to Planned Parenthood!
A few decades before that, Jeb’s father, George H. W. Bush, actually helped introduce family planning legislation in Congressâ€Š—â€Šonly moving his position on abortion and birth control to the right when he was nominated for vice president.
And in his grandfather’s generation, Prescott Bush not only raised money for Planned Parenthood, but actually held a leadership position in the organization.
So with all of Jeb’s bragging about being the most anti-choice candidate “in modern times,” he might finally have succeeded in getting his political apple to fall to the right of the family tree.
But the reality is that what Jeb says doesn’t really matter all that much. Actions will always speak louder than words. And Jeb’s actions speak volumes about the kind of candidateâ€Š—â€Šand the kind of presidentâ€Š—â€Šhe’s trying to become.
After all, we’re talking about a man who once put the life of a disabled woman who’d been raped at risk by intervening legally to force her to carry her child to termâ€Š—â€Ša move a Florida court later found illegal.
We’re talking about a man who, as governor, signed a controversial abortion ban into lawâ€Š—â€Šand praised a similar measure passed by the House on Wednesday as “humane and compassionate.”
We’re talking about a man who likes to defend his anti-choice record by saying “the most vulnerable in our society need to be protected”â€Š—â€Ševen though he’s shown he’s not above playing politics with a child’s body, once going so far as governor as appealing the decision of a court that ruled a 13-year-old girl could have an abortion when her pregnancy posed an extreme risk to her health.
We’re talking about someone who likes to talk a big game about how taxpayer dollars should never be used to fund abortionsâ€Š—â€Ševen though he slipped millions in taxpayer dollars to Florida “crisis pregnancy centers” notorious for lying to and misleading women about their reproductive health choices. (This, in a state where 73 percent of counties have no abortion providers and crisis centers may be the only places women have to turn for the medical care they desperately need.)
And let’s not forget that Jeb once held $1 million in family planning grants hostage until the programs receiving the money agreed not to discuss birth control at all.
This is a candidate who will stop at nothing to win. And at the end of the day, while Jeb’s right-wing rhetoric might make him stand out from his family, in 2016’s ultra-conservative GOP presidential field, Jeb’s positions will just make him blend in. And if his struggle to define his position on Iraq this week is any indication, you never know where a desperate Jeb is going to go.