NRA to Host 'Marquee' Event in 'Gun-Free Zone' After Describing Such Places as Advertisements for an 'Insane Killer'

The NRA is choosing to host the pinnacle event of its annual meeting at a venue that does not allow members of the public to carry firearms, a decision that stands in sharp contrast to claims from NRA leadership that "gun-free zones" are not safe and should be avoided.


The NRA will hold its annual meeting April 10-12 in Nashville, Tennessee, with events primarily occurring at the Music City Center, which is an exhibition hall, and the Bridgestone Arena.

Some attendees are upset that they will not be allowed to carry guns at the Bridgestone Arena during the event, due to the venue's policy prohibiting firearms, according to Nashville Public Radio.

The NRA frequently tells supporters that gun-free zones imperil their lives, enable mass shootings and invite terrorists.

During the 2015 Conservative Political Action Conference, NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre told the crowd that the Islamic State is "carving a bloody trail that leads to our doorstep" and suggested it is not a matter of "if" but "when" a terrorist attack will occur at "the supposedly gun-free zone of the Mall of America."

In remarks following the 2012 mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, LaPierre compared the practice of announcing no-gun policies to placing an advertisement for an "insane killer."

Nevertheless, the NRA has booked event space on multiple occasions for its annual meetings in places where firearms are not allowed.

According to the NRA, the biggest event of the 2015 annual meeting will be performances by musician Alan Jackson and comedian Jeff Foxworthy, both at the Bridgestone Arena. (In years past the NRA's Saturday night event has featured speeches, including remarks by Glenn Beck and Sarah Palin, but no speaker has been announced at this time.) 

In booking the Bridgestone Arena, the NRA is inviting its most loyal members into the type of place it has argued is not safe. Fortunately, no evidence exists that "gun-free zones"— a term used by the NRA and conservative media to describe places where civilians are not allowed to carry guns—are actually unsafe compared to anyplace else.

According to an analysis of 62 public mass shootings by Mother Jones, there is no evidence that any of the gunmen chose their targets because of a policy that prohibited the carrying of guns. Twenty mass shootings included in the analysis took place at workplaces because they "involved perpetrators who felt wronged by employers and colleagues." None of the 62 shootings were stopped by an armed civilian.

Gun violence prevention group Everytown for Gun Safety tracked all mass shootings between January 2009 and July 2014 and found that just 17 percent of incidents occurred in "gun-free zones," while the rest occurred where guns can legally be carried. Overall the presence of more firearms tends to increase violence rather than reduce crime.

Still, members of the NRA leadership have argued that a policy not allowing guns to be carried is tantamount to an invitation for mass murder:

  • During an NRA press conference following the mass shooting at Sandy Hook Elementary School, NRA executive vice president Wayne LaPierre argued that putting up a "gun-free zone" sign was an invitation to an "insane killer." LaPierre said, "Politicians pass laws for gun-free school zones, they issue press releases bragging about them. They post signs advertising them. And, in doing so, they tell every insane killer in America that schools are the safest place to inflict maximum mayhem with minimum risk." At CPAC 2015, LaPierre said, "The Islamic State is consolidating power, with beheadings, rapes, murders, and atrocities. They're carving a bloody trail that leads to our doorstep. They're already here. How much longer before the horrors that we witnessed in Paris or in Copenhagen come to the supposedly gun-free zone of the Mall of America. Think about that. Or for that matter the mall in your town, wherever you live."
  • NRA board member Ted Nugent has called gun-free zones "the most dangerous places in the world." He wrote that the "gun-free zone policy" of Virginia Tech "enabled" the 2007 mass shooting at that school and claimed that "gun-free zones" "are really engineered slaughter zones." In a recent column Nugent wrote of keeping a gun handy: "If you choose not to have a weapon to defend yourself and home-invading meth-heads rape, torture and murder you and your children, that is a dumb and irresponsible choice."
  • Past NRA president and current NRA lobbyist Marion Hammer recently wrote: "Too often, college campuses are gun-free zones where murderers, rapists and other violent criminals can commit their crimes without fear of being harmed by their victims."
  • At last year's NRA annual meeting in Indianapolis, top NRA lobbyist Chris Cox argued that gun-free zones "encourage criminals and psychopaths."
  • Following the Sandy Hook mass shooting, the NRA released an advertisement criticizing the fact that the children of President Obama and other "elitist hypocrite[s]" have armed security, arguing, "Protection for their kids, and gun-free zones for ours."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close