Richard Dawkins Says that Humanity Has Only 50% Chance of Surviving Into the Next Century

On Tuesday's The Daily Show, scientist and atheist Richard Dawkins said that the greatest threat to the human species comes from the possibility that powerful technologies could, in theory, fall into the hands of religious fanatics. This possibility, he said, gives the entire human race an only 50 percent chance of surviving into the next century.


Stewart began the show's segment with a quote from a liberal Presbyterian pastor who asserted that the christian faith and scientific princinples are not as diametrically opposed as the culture would have one believe. 

"Yes, I'm aware of that," Dawkins said. "It's a point I often make, and I often join forces with bishops and other friends to combat the anti-scientific tendency of fundamentalist religion." Dawkins went on to explain that it is a common misconception that all religious people are fundamentalists, when in fact they're not.    

Stewart then proposed the question of whether "the end of our civilization will be through religious strife or scientific advancement," essentially asking which will, in the long term, be more damaging to the human race.

Dawkins, quoting British Astronomer Royal Sir Martin Rees, cited the potential 50-percent stastic, stating that "[Rees] fears that the fruits of scientific advancement — the bad fruits, things like dirty bombs, things like biological warfare — could get into the hands of religious fanatics, who unlike all other terrorists, actually want to die.” 

Overall, a very light interview, as you can see.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.