Drill, Baby, Drill Strategy Won’t Lower Gasoline Prices, Will Enrich Big Oil
The AP reports today: This is a good news, bad news story, which the media, characteristically, gets half right.
U.S. oil output is surging so fast that the United States could soon overtake Saudi Arabia as the world’s biggest producer. Driven by high prices and new drilling methods, U.S. production of crude and other liquid hydrocarbons is on track to rise 7 percent this year to an average of 10.9 million barrels per day.
This will be the fourth straight year of crude increases and the biggest single-year gain since 1951….
The increase in production hasn’t translated to cheaper gasoline at the pump, and prices are expected to stay relatively high for the next few years because of growing demand for oil in developing nations and political instability in the Middle East and North Africa.
So much for consumers benefiting from Drill, Baby, Drill. But hey, at least America can be #1 again:
The Energy Department forecasts that U.S. production of crude and other liquid hydrocarbons, which includes biofuels, will average 11.4 million barrels per day next year. That would be a record for the U.S. and just below Saudi Arabia’s output of 11.6 million barrels. Citibank forecasts U.S. production could reach 13 million to 15 million barrels per day by 2020, helping to make North America “the new Middle East.”
Here is the ironic cover of that recent 92-page Citibank report (which, it must be noted, never mentions either “climate change” or “global warming” as potential risks to this scenario):
See, when your farmland turns into the Sahara thanks to unrestricted emissions from burning coal, oil, and gas, you’ll have a bunch of cool oil derricks to show for it.
And lest you were worried that there aren’t enough oil and gas shale plays to cover all our future Dust-Bowlified farm land, the U.S. Energy Information Administration (EIA) has this reassuringchart of North American shale plays, which can be tapped by fracking and horizontal drilling:
You’ll note the extensive overlap with the updated National Center for Atmospheric Research maps of projected Dust-Bowlification if we don’t leave most fossil carbon and virtually all unconventional fuels in the ground:
The Palmer Drought Severity Index (PDSI) in the 2060s and 2090s in a moderate emissions path. A ”reading of -4 or below is considered extreme drought.” The PDSI in the Great Plains during the Dust Bowl apparently spiked very briefly to -6, but otherwise rarely exceeded -3 for the decade (see here).
So who benefits from unrestricted drilling if not U.S. consumers or future generations? The AP notes:
The companies profiting range from independent drillers to large international oil companies such as Royal Dutch Shell, which increasingly see the U.S. as one of the most promising places to drill. ExxonMobil agreed last month to spend $1.6 billion to increase its U.S. oil holdings.
The article ends with the cheerful glass-is-one-tenth-full words of economist Philip Verleger:
“Drivers will have to pay high prices, sure, but at least they’ll have a job.“
… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.
It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.