2012 Campaign Marked By Blitz of Empty Populist Rhetoric Against Wall Street

All those political ads flooding our media are smacking dozens of different targets. One particularly: Wall Street. From mid-April to mid-September, Ad Age reports, $1 of every $10 spent on campaign ads has blasted bankers.


And these ads haven’t just come from Democrats. The list of “big anti-Wall Street spenders” even includesthe Republican National Committee.

Campaign strategists are placing these anti-Wall Street ads for an obvious reason. Wall Street’s greed grab, they understand, has deeply angered America.

Last week brought still more cause for that anger. New York’s state comptroller, Thomas DiNapoli, revealed that average annual pay on Wall Street has shot up 16 percent over the last two years to $362,950.

Financial industry pay in New York is now running 5.3 times higher than pay in the rest of the private sector. In 1980, Wall Streeters only averaged twice the private sector’s take-home.

The typical employee on Wall Street isn’t, of course, making $362,950. Wall Street secretaries don’t sit anywhere near that lofty total. But investment bankers and traders are making millions above it, and Wall Street’s “greater concentration” of these “most highly compensated positions,” as New York’s comptroller puts it, wildly skews the overall average.

What are these “most highly compensated” doing to earn their millions? They’re running a casino. They take bets on stocks, currency, and commodities — and while away the hours designing ever more exotic financial “innovations” to bet on.

On every bet, Wall Streeters take a cut, just like the “house” at any casino. And sometimes they rig the game and place their own bets on the sure-winners.

This endless gambling impacts us all. Wall Street has essentially placed our entire economy on a risky roller coaster. On the ups and downs, crashes — even Great Recessions — become unavoidable.

Most Americans have at least a vague sense of these dynamics, and candidates are seeking to exploit this public unease with all those anti-Wall Street campaign ads. But we don’t need ads from candidates. We need commitments from them — to rein in our economic casino.

How could these candidates start reining? They could enact what analysts call a financial transaction tax, a tiny levy on every “trade” — every gamble — that Wall Streeters take.

Gamblers throughout the U.S. financial industry currently pay no tax on their wagers. All other gamblers in the United States do. Out of every $2 racetrack bet, a tax comes out. But Wall Street wheeler-dealers who can routinely bet billions pay no taxes whatsoever.

A growing number of lawmakers in Congress are aiming to change this 1 percent-friendly status quo. They’ve introduced over a dozen different financial transaction tax bills. The latest — from Rep. Keith Ellison of Minnesota — would place a 0.5 percent tax on every stock trade and somewhat smaller taxes on every trade of bonds, derivatives, and currencies.

Wall Street movers and shakers are predicting economic doom, not surprisingly, should a financial transaction tax ever become law. Traders will merely, they argue, shift their trading abroad.

But if these traders should flee, they’ll have a hard time outrunning financial transaction taxation. Last week, 11 European nations, led by France and Germany, agreed to implement a new tax on stock, bond, and derivative trading.

This landmark new victory for financial transaction taxation in Europe figures to give Ellison’s bill some substantial momentum. Some 130 organizations, part of a  “Robin Hood tax” campaign, have already endorsed it.

These Robin Hood campaigners don’t have a fraction of the cash spent so far on all those anti-Wall Street political campaign ads. But they do now have solid legislation to push — and an equally solid determination to keep all those anti-Wall Street candidates honest.

To encourage your representative in Congress to co-sponsor Rep. Keith Ellison’s new Robin Hood tax, click to this online action center.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.