Mitt Romney Endorsed Bonkers Quack Science of 'Cold Fusion' as America's Energy Solution

This article was produced in partnership with

Coming hot on the heels of Mitt Romney's own demand for windows that can defy the basic laws of physics and open in airplanes, exposing him to ridicule across the web, a new factually impossible scientific statement from the candidate has been unearthed. This one involves the debunked notion of cold fusion.

Cold Fusion--or the idea of creating nuclear reactions at much lower temperatures--is a widely-known scientific joke, or as Wikipedia puts it "It has been rejected by the mainstream scientific community because ...there is no generally accepted theoretical model of cold fusion." It's as though scientists claimed to discover the genesis of life or the missing evolutionary link and then were revealed to have just made mistakes.

But that doesn't stop Mitt Romney from being a believer, apparently. In a 2011 interview with the Washington Examiner, he offered this about his love of science (h/t Daily Kos).

I do believe in basic science. I believe in participating in space. I believe in analysis of new sources of energy. I believe in laboratories, looking at ways to conduct electricity with -- with cold fusion, if we can come up with it. It was the University of Utah that solved that. We somehow can’t figure out how to duplicate it.

First of all, cold fusion wasn't about conducting electricity, but about creating power. But more egregiously, as DailyKos's Jed Lewison points out, shortly after the original cold fusion "experiments" mentioned by Mitt Romney occurred, the alleged findings were given the kibosh.

He points to a contemporaneous New York Times article explaining the lack of evidence behind the cold fusion claims.

BALTIMORE—Hopes that a new kind of nuclear fusion might give the world an unlimited source of cheap energy appear to have been dealt a devastating blow by scientific evidence presented here...

Physicists seemed generally persuaded as the sessions ended that assertions of "cold fusion" were based on nothing more than experimental errors by scientists in Utah.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.