Junk Food Companies Pledge to Reduce Calories and Fight Obesity in US While Ramping up Their Presence in the Developing World
Last month, in a bid to preempt any binding government action, sixteen food and beverage companies announced a pledge to reduce 1.5 trillion calories from their products in the US by the end of 2015 -- ostensibly to fight obesity in the US.
Indeed, the growing obesity epidemic in the US has caught the attention of the White House, and Mrs. Michelle Obama in particular.
The announcement by the Healthy Weight Commitment Foundation - -- comprising some of the largest food and beverage companies in the US -- came just five days after the release of the White House Task Force on Childhood Obesity Report to the President, part of Mrs. Obama's Let's Move campaign designed to address the growing obesity epidemic in the US.
The White House Task Force report and its recommendations suggested that unless the industry made significant changes in the way it markets unhealthy junk food to children in the US, government policies could be introduced to make them do so.
Whether the announcement by the companies -- which is short on the details -- is a genuine commitment to reduce obesity or a public relations maneuver to appease Mrs. Obama and the White House remains to be seen.
What is significant, however, is that the fast food industry in the US and its role in marketing and selling unhealthy junk food to Americans is being widely accepted as a big part of the problem of the obesity epidemic in the US.
According to the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, two-thirds of American adults and 15 percent of American children are overweight or obese, and consequently, at high risk of developing heart disease, diabetes and cancer.
The obesity epidemic has become so alarming in the US that it led to more than 130 retired generals, admirals and senior military leaders to frame the issue as a national security threat, writing that, "Obesity rates threaten the overall health of America and the future strength of our military."
Consumers in the US are slowly becoming more nutrition-savvy -- increasingly reading food labels and rejecting high-fat, high-sugar and highly processed products. Much more needs to be done however, to contain the abundance of cheap and empty calorie intake which is ubiquitous in the US food landscape today.
Mrs. Obama's focus on the food and beverage companies is not the first. It bolsters the efforts of New York city, which has been a leader in campaigning against trans fat, then high sugar beverages, and now sodium. And California has not been far behind, banning the sale of high sugar products and other junk food in public schools, for example.
So it comes as a major disappointment that while companies like Pepsico, Coca-Cola, Unilever, Nestle, Kraft Foods and the like have pledged commitments to reduce calorie intake and fight obesity in the US, these very companies are extremely busy ramping up their presence in the developing world, and China and India in particular.
Pepsico just announced a $2.5 billion investment in China to increase its beverages and snacks industry. Earlier this year, Pepsico announced a $200 million investment in India to expand operations. Coca-Cola announced an additional $250 million investment in India in 2008 to build more bottling plants and increase its market share. McDonalds just announced an additional $20 million annually to open 30 outlets each year in India.
Rapid expansion in the emerging markets may make good business sense from the perspective of these companies. Consumers in the US and other mature markets are becoming increasingly savvy to the negative health impacts of these products. And these companies are struggling to grow in the developed economies.
But if high-fat, high-sugar and highly processed foods are bad for the health of Americans, are they any good for people in India and China?
The answer, obviously, is a clear no.
Increasing investments in the developing world by these peddlers of junk food is a clear case of double standards. While these companies are pledging to reduce calories in the US to tackle obesity, they are simultaneously expanding their markets -- with junk food -- in the developing world.
Junk food is the last thing that China and India need -- both countries are already experiencing startling growth in obesity and related health problems.
A recent government survey in India found that more than 20 percent of urban Indians are overweight or obese. And India was, until recently, the diabetes capital of the world, according to the International Diabetes Federation, only to be overtaken by China.
China is also experiencing a rapid rise in obesity. Today 30 percent of Chinese adults are overweight or obese, compared with 25 percent in 2004. "More than 92 million Chinese adults suffer from Type-2 diabetes, caused mainly by a high-calorie diet and sedentary lifestyle, according to a study in the March 25 New England Journal of Medicine. Based on this data, the International Diabetes Federation in Brussels estimates close to half a billion Chinese will have the disease in 2030."
Although one cannot blame the rise in Western junk food as the sole or even primary reason for the alarming rates of obesity and related diseases in China and India, it is clear that adding more high-fat, high-sugar processed foods in these markets will significantly worsen the problem.
It also makes absolutely no sense for already overburdened public health systems in India and China to be inundated with more junk food related illnesses as the result of an expanded western junk food regime that have been found to be central to the growing obesity epidemic in the West.
If these food companies were serious about the social responsibilities that they so often tout, they would approach the growing obesity rates in India and China just as they have pledged to do in the US -- by not adding any more calories and in fact, reducing calories in the developing countries.
It will be the right thing to do.
People's health and people's lives in developing countries are as valuable as in the US.
So why the double standard?