Senate Passes Compromised Health Care Reform -- Will Progressive Dems Support the Final Bill?

When President Obama spoke to members of Congress the other day about the need to enact health-care reform he conveniently forgot to mention the public option.

Senate Democrats got the message.

Their negotiators struck a tentative agreement Tuesday night to eliminate the "public option" -- the controversial but necessary plan to set up government-run insurance program to provide competition (and an incentive to hold down costs) for private insurers.

The negotiators tried to ease the blow to the hopes of progressive reformers by agreeing to an initiative that would create a number of national insurance policies that would be developed by the federal Office of Personnel Management, which oversees health policies for federal workers, but administered by private firms.

If the private firms fail to do an adequate job, the Senate bill calls for establishment of a genuine public option.

More significantly, the Senate bill proposes to drop the Medicare eligibility rate to 55, a move that would permit millions of Americans to buy into the immensely popular federal program for retirees.

These are not inconsequential steps. Nor are the new regulations of insurance companies that are contained in the Senate bill, which Democrats leaders now believe they have a genuine chance of passing -- perhaps even gaining a Republican vote, that of Maine's Olympia Snowe. (But both Snowe are Connecticut Independent Joe Lieberman have expressed reservations about dropping the Medicare eligibility age.)

But the loss of the public option remains a bitter pill -- especially for progressives who want to expand access to health care and hold down the costs that are run up by insurance company profiteering.

Wisconsin Democrat Russ Feingold lodged the most serious objection, saying he would not "support proposals that would replace the public option in the bill with a purely private approach."

"We need to have some competition for the insurance industry to keep rates down and save taxpayer dollars," said Feingold. "I will base my vote on the bill on the entirety of what is in the bill, and whether I think the bill is good for Wisconsin."

Feingold is not alone in his concerns although, as usual, he is the more willing than most senators to stand on his own against the leadership.

Where does this leave us?

Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid's still got some serious cajoling to do if he plans to pass a bill before the Holiday break.

#story_page_ below_article

Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.