Historic Climate Conference Opens to Dire Warnings

COPENHAGEN—A landmark conference on tackling climate change opened in Copenhagen on Monday to warnings of apocalyptic danger for humankind if world leaders failed to seize the moment.

The impact on humanity of human-made drought, flood, storms, and rising seas were spelled out at the start of the 12-day meeting, which will climax with a summit attended by more than 110 heads of state or government.

Danish Prime Minister Lars Loekke Rasmussen warned that the world was looking to Copenhagen to safeguard the generations of tomorrow. "For the next two weeks, Copenhagen will be Hopenhagen. By the end, we must be able to deliver back to the world what was granted us here today: hope for a better future," he said.

In Washington, meanwhile, the Environmental Protection Agency declared carbon dioxide a public health threat, meaning that the EPA was "now authorized and obligated to make reasonable efforts" to cut greenhouse gas emissions, said EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson.

Analysts said the announcement was timed to coincide with the U.N. talks, and strengthen the U.S. position.

"It will only help to persuade delegates and observers from other countries that the U.S. is seriously using all the tools it has," said David Doniger, policy director of the National Resources Defense Council's climate center. "The [Obama] administration has the task of persuading other countries that it is seriously tackling this issue at a time when the legislation is still working its way through Congress."

"This gives additional credibility to the U.S. commitment," said Brice Lalonde, France's ambassador for climate.

The negotiation marathon gathers members of the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC), the fruit of the 1992 Rio summit. Its rollcall of 192 nations was joined this year by Iraq and Somalia, the conference heard.

Delegates must craft a blueprint for tackling human-made greenhouse gases blamed for trapping solar heat and disrupting Earth's fragile climate system. They must also put together a funding mechanism able to channel hundreds of billions of dollars to poor nations most exposed to climate change.

If all goes well, world leaders on Dec. 18 will agree on a political deal that sets down the course of action, including a roster of national pledges. Further negotiations are expected to take place in 2010 to fill in the details. A legally binding treaty would take effect from the end of 2012.

Analysts, though, point to the huge gap between demands from developing countries and the willingness of rich countries to dig both into their pockets and into their carbon emissions.

Connie Hedegaard, a Danish minister elected to chair the talks, said political will would "never be stronger."

"This is our chance," she said. "If we miss it, it could take years before we get a new and better one—if ever."

President Obama is hoping to push through a new deal after the United States—the world's biggest economy—rejected the Kyoto Protocol under his predecessor, George W. Bush.

Leading U.S. negotiator Jonathan Pershing was cautious, saying Copenhagen was only a stepping stone. "We don't see the process far enough advanced at this meeting to support a legal treaty," he told reporters. "We see it beginning with a political arrangement that would be operational, that would move elements and activities forward immediately, and that would then be followed by a negotiation of a legal arrangement."

Obama's critics have been emboldened by a scandal over hacked emails from British academics, which they say raises questions about the science behind climate change.

The head of the U.N.‘s Nobel-winning panel of climate experts on Monday savaged the email intercepts as a suspected bid to undermine his organization. "Given the wide-ranging nature of [climate] change that is likely to be taken in hand, some naturally find it inconvenient to accept its inevitability," Rajendra Pachauri, chair of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), told the conference.

But Saudi Arabia's top climate negotiator said trust in climate science had been "shaken" by the leaked emails. "The level of trust is definitely shaken, especially now that we are about to conclude an agreement that ... is going to mean sacrifices for our economies," Mohammed al-Sabban told delegates. Sabban, whose country is oil cartel OPEC's leading producer and exporter, called for an "independent" international investigation, charging that the IPCC was unqualified to carry it out.


Understand the importance of honest news ?

So do we.

The past year has been the most arduous of our lives. The Covid-19 pandemic continues to be catastrophic not only to our health - mental and physical - but also to the stability of millions of people. For all of us independent news organizations, it’s no exception.

We’ve covered everything thrown at us this past year and will continue to do so with your support. We’ve always understood the importance of calling out corruption, regardless of political affiliation.

We need your support in this difficult time. Every reader contribution, no matter the amount, makes a difference in allowing our newsroom to bring you the stories that matter, at a time when being informed is more important than ever. Invest with us.

Make a one-time contribution to Alternet All Access, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you.

Click to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card
Donate by Paypal
{{ post.roar_specific_data.api_data.analytics }}

Don't Sit on the Sidelines of History. Join Alternet All Access and Go Ad-Free. Support Honest Journalism.