Nobel Committee Admits Getting Into Derivatives Trading in Giving Peace Prize to Obama

A spokesman from the Nobel committee yesterday spoke on condition of anonymity about the controversial decision to award the Nobel Peace Prize to President Barack Obama, who as yet has solved no international crisis or created peaceful resolution to any conflict but has delivered some awesome speeches that have breathed new life into the Norwegian stock exchange, the Red Herring 500, according to the committee member.


"There's derivatives trading now in virtually every commodity known to humankind," noted the source. "So why not peace?"

He added that rare commodities with unpredictable futures are particularly attractive to derivatives traders and that peace certainly falls into that category. With many on the right objecting that Obama hasn't done anything to earn the prize and many on the left complaining that his record domestically has been to deliver magnificent speeches without following up with any decisive actions and to paper over conflicts with inspiring words and half-measures, the Nobel committee member admitted on background that he wasn't sure whether the action of the committee technically could be considered hedging or derivatives trading, but he was counting on it to create a competitive market for both peace and Obama memorabilia.

According to inside sources, the decision to award Obama the peace prize represented an unprecedented joint decision of the committees charged with selecting winners in economics and peace.

Derivatives are complex financial products that no one on the peace committee understood. However, it had help from the committee on economics, which has been considering co-awarding its Nobel this year to Timothy Geithner and Larry Summers for their collaboration in creating and then halting the economic crisis that began with the collapse of Lehman Bros. in September 2008.

One member of the economics committee pointed out the extraordinary nature of their achievement: "Before Geithner and Summers, we could only perform econometric computer simulations. They were the first to demonstrate experimentally, in real time, that you can collapse the world economy with neoclassical economic theories and then revive it with Keynesian principles. We've been waiting for someone to test Keynesian principles definitively in the real world for over 60 years. This is a truly stunning achievement."

Members of the peace committee were moved by the arguments of their colleagues in economics.

"The possibilities of trading in secondary peace products are extremely exciting," noted the anonymous source. "Imagine if we could have used the peace prize to leverage Mussolini into not exercising his option to buy fascism from Hitler in the early to mid-1930s."

Unfortunately, the Great Depression made any attempt at deregulation of peace commodities at that time untenable.

Upon hearing about the committee's decision to introduce speculation into the peace market, a number of experts expressed serious concerns.

"Now is not the time to introduce subprime honorees into the Nobel portfolio," argued one experienced diplomat, who worried that the committee might next award the prize to Libyan not-so-strong-man-anymore Moammar Gadhafi. Doing so, he argued, could lead to an inflated peace market that could produce the equivalent of a housing bubble, or at least an inflated tent.

The committee had apparently strongly considered Gadhafi as an alternative to Obama, noting that his decision not to blow up any planes in over 20 years constituted a Nobel-caliber contribution to world peace, and that, like Obama, he had done something by doing nothing. However, his chances were dramatically reduced when the Libyan government gave a hero's welcome to the returning Lockerbee bomber who had been released on humanitarian grounds because he has three months left to live, after doctors in Scotland determined him either to be, or to have, a "malignant asshole."

Insiders have acknowledged that this was a weak year for candidates for the peace prize, leading to the unusual decision to bet on futures rather than follow the century-old precedent of selecting someone who has actually accomplished something, like Yassir Arafat, who once shaved for an episode of "Terrorists Gone Wild."

Given its interest in borrowing methods from the financial industry, however, the committee did consider short-selling the prize to former Vice President Dick Cheney. However, it ultimately decided that Cheney had already been awarded the title of "Dick," and that they couldn't really top that.

The committee's decision ultimately came down to the choice between either Obama for not being George Bush or Bush for not being president.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card

Close

Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.