Was It "Pirates" or Israeli Intelligence That Intercepted a Ship Loaded with Russian Defense Missiles?

A few days ago, in a blog post, I translated portions of an Israeli news story about the Arctic Sea affair which, along with a Time magazine report surmised that Israeli intelligence had intercepted or been involved in the interception of the ship, the Arctic Sea, while it was carrying Russian missiles destined for either Iran or Hezbollah.

Several readers, whose opinions I trust, dismissed these theories as improbable for various reasons. But it appears they are quite likely to be wrong, and the original story is likely to be correct.

Read the posted link above for the background on the original, strange, mysterious story about the ship Arctic Sea. What has happened since is that Russian and Israeli sources have contended that the Arctic Sea was carrying not just any Russian missile, but the nation's most sophisticated S-300 system, which could protect Iran's nuclear facilities from Israeli attack:

News reports over the weekend, citing military sources in Israel and Russia, said the Arctic Sea had been loaded with S-300 missiles at the Kaliningrad naval port without the Kremlin's knowledge.

I repeat a question I asked in my earlier post: How could the Russian government not have known a cargo of its most precious military technology was being loaded in its own naval port? I would surmise that elements of the Russian military and shady arms dealers must have been in cahoots to bring this kind of complex caper off:

Earlier this month, Mikhail Voitenko, a Russian journalist who specializes in maritime reporting, fled abroad after he said he received threats for his reporting that [the] ship was likely being used by corrupt officials to carry weapons. Voitenko broke the story of the ship's initial "disappearance" from the Baltic Sea.

Adding flesh to the story is a BBC report that Israeli intelligence confirms its involvement in the Arctic Sea adventure:

Israel was linked to the interception of the missing cargo ship Arctic Sea last month, a senior figure close to Israeli intelligence has told the BBC. The source said Israel had told Moscow it knew the ship was secretly carrying a Russian air-defense system for Iran …

The Israeli source told the BBC that the piracy story was a cover and that Israel told Moscow it was giving officials time to stop the shipment before making the matter public …

Could it be a coincidence that Israeli President Shimon Peres made a hastily scheduled trip to Moscow the day after the ship was freed? That was when Peres made the rather astonishing statement that an Iranian bomb was like a "flying death camp."

When I first wrote about this, I could only speculate about what he went to talk to the Russians about. But now it becomes clearer, as the S-300 is the single most-feared weapons system the Russians could provide the Iranians. Israel has made loud and clear in every way possible that it does not want Russia to sell it to Iran.

The fact that country almost managed to secure the system surreptitiously would have provided Peres quite a bit to talk about. And if indeed the Russian leadership did not know what was happening in Kaliningrad, then it might have been eager to explain to the Israelis how this little caper got as far along as it did.

Another little matter that would have interested the Russians is how the Mossad knew about this shipment, while the Kremlin was asleep at the switch.

Further, Yediot Achronot broke the story of a "secret" trip by Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to Moscow on Monday.

If Israel does attack Iran (which it clearly wants to do), it doesn't want to lose half its pilots doing so. With this technology, Iran would not only harden its targets, it would inflict serious damage on the Israeli air force. I would contend that if Israel does not seriously contemplate attacking Iran, then these missiles should not be as big a matter for Israel as they appear to be.

One of the more humorous aspects of this story is the Russian foreign minister imploring the world media to keep their powder dry and not jump to any conclusions:

"All will become transparent, and I hope that everyone will be convinced that the rumors you refer to are absolutely groundless," [Sergey] Lavrov told reporters.

Given the Russian aspiration toward the ideal of full transparency and democracy, I'd say the chances of anyone trusting Lavrov's promise are about slim to none.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.