Three Years Later, So-Called "Secure Border Initiative" Remains a Bad Idea, Poorly Executed

On September 17, the House Committee on Homeland Security Subcommittee on Border, Maritime and Global Counterterrorism held a hearing, "The Secure Border Initiative: SBInet Three Years Later." The Secure Border Initiative is a combination of surveillance technologies and physical infrastructure meant to deter illegal border crossing.

The technological element, SBInet -- a system of cameras, radars and sensors--is seven years behind schedule on a three-year project. The "tactical infrastructure" includes 661 miles of vehicle and pedestrian barriers. In total, more than $3.5 billion have been spent on the Secure Border initiative. The border fences and walls have cost $2.4 billion. The tab for the construction and maintenance of the fence over the next 20 years will come to a little under $500,000 per mile per year.

The Government Accountability Office (GAO) released a report, discussed in the hearing on the 17th, which was critical -- to say the least -- of the Secure Border Initiative. Deployment of the technology is years behind schedule. The fences/walls/barriers are nearly complete, but effectiveness of the border fencing has not been measured.

The GAO report, and news reports about the hearing, gave the impression that the Secure Border Initiative has been very effective in draining the Treasury, but its effectiveness in preventing illegal immigration is yet to be determined.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.