Mind the 'Welfare Wedge:' The Right's Overlooked Ammo in Health Care Sabotage

Eric Kleefeld posted a clip that's making the rounds on right-wing blogs featuring a confrontation between a conservative activist and Rep. Norm Dicks (D-Wash.) at a town-hall meeting.

The activist argued that health care reform is part of an effort to "plunder" from some to benefit those without. "If you are so keen to forcibly take from one person to give to another, who you deem as needier than me," the woman said. "If you believe that it is absolutely moral to take my money and give to someone else based on their supposed needs, then you come and take this $20 from me and use it as a down payment on this health care plan."

Now, Dicks wisely steered this in another direction, but the activist's complaint touches on part of the right-wing pushback that sometimes goes overlooked. It's not just about paranoia-inspired fears ("death panels"), Republican boilerplate ("socialized medicine"), or even big-picture ideology ("government = bad"). There's also the underlying disgust over the notion of providing coverage to those who don't already have it.

It's been a cornerstone of conservative thought for years: no handouts. The activist who confronted Dicks couldn't have been more clear: she didn't want the government taking her money to give it to "someone else based on their supposed needs." She's got hers; the tens of millions of American who have no coverage aren't her problem.

Ed Kilgore recently had a good item on this tack.

This should be familiar to any political observer over the age of 30 as a new version of the old "welfare wedge": the emotionally powerful conservative argument that Democrats want to use Big Government to take away the good things of life from people who have earned them and give them to people who haven't. [...]

[Y]ou don't have to be a liberal, or a Democrat, or an Obama supporter to be concerned about the return of the "welfare wedge" and with it the savage treatment of hard-pressed working Americans as irresponsible bums who are conspiring toward a socialist society.

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.