Shocker: Exxon Mobil Violates the Law

I'm positively shocked, shocked I tell you! I'm sure the following allegations of criminal activity by one of the largest multinational companies in the world are completely unfounded:


AUSTIN — Texas Land Commissioner Jerry Patterson called on the state's powerful oil regulatory agency Tuesday to open hearings into allegations that Irving-based Exxon Mobil Corp. improperly plugged and sabotaged oil wells in a South Texas county after failed negotiations to reduce royalty payments.

Patterson said the alleged violations could possibly result in more than $1 billion in administrative fees to the state from the nation's largest oil company. But Exxon Mobil said in a statement that the Republican official’s allegations are "groundless" and "paint a false and misleading picture" of its involvement in the Refugio County wells.

And here I thought Exxon Mobil had all Texas Republican politicians in their vest pocket. Wonder why Mr. Jerry Patterson decided to go against the flow? Oh, wait, here's a possible explanation. There's other rich folks involved. Well bust my britches if this doesn't read like an episode from Dallas (link to the show provided for our younger members at the Trib):

The case stems from a legal dispute between Exxon Mobil and the O’Connor family, a South Texas dynasty whose roots date to the Texas Republic. The family owns thousands of acres of oil-rich land in Refugio County.

In the early 1950s, Humble Oil and Refining Co., an Exxon Mobil predecessor, negotiated an oil lease with the family, ultimately drilling 121 wells that produced at least 15 million barrels of oil and more than 65 billion cubic feet of gas, resulting in royalty payments of at least $43 million, according to court documents.

But in the early 1970s, Exxon Mobil sought to negotiate a lower royalty because the profitability was declining. After the negotiations failed, the family entered into another lease with a company now known as Emerald Oil & Gas.

The family alleges that when Emerald attempted to reopen the abandoned wells, workers discovered that the well bores had been plugged and sabotaged with oilfield junk such as cut well casings and contaminated oil tank sludge. The family also alleged that Exxon Mobil sought to cover up the sabotage with misleading reports filed with the Railroad Commission.

Emerald and the royalty owners filed suit in 1996, accusing Exxon Mobil of intentionally sabotaging the field. A trial court ordered Exxon Mobil to pay $18.6 million to the plaintiffs. That ruling was upheld by an appeals court, but the Texas Supreme Court overturned the rulings in what Patterson called a statute of limitations technicality, effectively saying the O’Connor family had waited too long to file its grievances.


Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

Close
alternet logo

Tough Times

Demand honest news. Help support AlterNet and our mission to keep you informed during this crisis.