The Day After: Tea Party Numbers Were Low; Hardly a 'Revolution'

One of the smarter aspects of the Tea Party protests was making them accessible to participants at the local level. If organizers had attempted to hold one big rally, on the Washington Mall, for example, it would have probably run into more trouble. For one thing, it would be compared against other Mall events. For another, plenty of conservative activists nationwide would have struggled to get to D.C.

Organizers, then, made stronger turnout far more likely by hosting hundreds of events from coast to coast, rather than one event in a prominent location. Committed activists didn't need to travel hundreds of miles to register their outrage; chances are, there was a gathering of like-minded folks in their own area.

Did it pay off? It depends on one's standards and expectations. It's almost impossible to get a reliable count of just how many people attended these events yesterday, but The Atlantic's Chris Good offers a rundown and tries to at least apply a minimum number.

A bare minimum of 25,650 people turned out for tea party protests across the country today, according to news estimates, a survey of reports from local newspapers, TV affiliates, and wire services shows.

Presumably, more than that turned out. The tendency of smaller cities (particularly state capitols) to draw larger crowds makes counting difficult, and many news outlets were not specific in their estimates (reporting "hundreds" or "thousands," for instance, as opposed to specific numbers -- the 25,650 figure assumes the lowest possible numbers within those ranges).

Fair enough. Just for the sake of conversation, let's take Good's minimum number, which is likely too low, and quadruple it. That would give us an estimate of about 100,000 activists attending rallies yesterday.

The next question, I suppose, is whether 100,000 protestors represents a significant force. Yesterday, before the events had even begun in earnest, Marc Ambinder said, "If ... 100,000 Americans show up to protest their taxes, the onus to dismiss them as a nascent political force shifts to the Democrats."

Enjoy this piece?

… then let us make a small request. AlterNet’s journalists work tirelessly to counter the traditional corporate media narrative. We’re here seven days a week, 365 days a year. And we’re proud to say that we’ve been bringing you the real, unfiltered news for 20 years—longer than any other progressive news site on the Internet.

It’s through the generosity of our supporters that we’re able to share with you all the underreported news you need to know. Independent journalism is increasingly imperiled; ads alone can’t pay our bills. AlterNet counts on readers like you to support our coverage. Did you enjoy content from David Cay Johnston, Common Dreams, Raw Story and Robert Reich? Opinion from Salon and Jim Hightower? Analysis by The Conversation? Then join the hundreds of readers who have supported AlterNet this year.

Every reader contribution, whatever the amount, makes a tremendous difference. Help ensure AlterNet remains independent long into the future. Support progressive journalism with a one-time contribution to AlterNet, or click here to become a subscriber. Thank you. Click here to donate by check.

DonateDonate by credit card


Thanks for your support!

Did you enjoy AlterNet this year? Join us! We're offering AlterNet ad-free for 15% off - just $2 per week. From now until March 15th.